Too Much of Something is Bad Enough

For all the Christian complaints about Harry Potter, it’s kind of surprising why there’s no Christian uproar towards Hazbin Hotel and the like. Even if this series glorifies Hell, Satan and demons a lot but it’s something they never really cared to complain about in any way, even if it has many of the things they hate they never really cared to notice much at all. Hazbin Hotel pretty much started life on YouTube, becoming something of a success with a spinoff called Helluva Boss. From my experience it seems more common for Christians to object to cartoons featuring witchcraft, not if they feature the Devil himself as it is with Cow and Chicken.

It’s even more surprising that not a lot of people objected to the portrayal of the Devil in both I am Weasel and Cow and Chicken, given how sympathetically portrayed he is there well not in any way I recognise the way they objected to Harry Potter. A very curious double standard, perhaps one engineered by Satan, where Christians object to anything with witchcraft but not works featuring the Devil himself in a more sympathetic manner alongside more troubling portrayals of Christianity. Harry Potter, to my knowledge, never portrayed Christians in a negative way but X-Men does with Reverend Stryker and Reverend Craig.

This is something not a lot of people have cared about in any way, if because the Devil likes it this way when his intentions are there but never noticed by this many people. When you have stories that glorify the Devil a lot such as Daredevil, Hazbin Hotel, X-Men and Helluva Boss, where they even portray demons and anything that seems demonic (Nightcrawler) in a sympathetic manner, it’s a troubling sign that Christians need to take heed of. It needn’t to be Harry Potter to be anti-Christian, others have done the same without raising this much ire from Evangelicals which makes it all the more baffling.

If you object to Harry Potter for being demonic, you should do the same with Hazbin Hotel and X-Men. These two actually feature more things Christians hate yet never get so frequently scrutinised as HP has been subjected to, to the point where it seems the Devil likes it this way and why Christians have poor media literacy. Especially in things that feature more of the things they hate, yet appear so innocent as to evade their radar (for the worse, unfortunately). Christians may benefit far more from media literacy, as to gain greater discernment.

Unfortunately given both how the Devil finds a way to make himself look innocent and lovable and that many Christians tend to be anti-intellectual, it’s going to be an uphill having any real discernment over other things that should concern the latter more. It’s not enough to call something demonic for portraying witchcraft when there are other things that do the same yet barely get noticed, let alone stories that either portray the Devil in a reverential manner (Daredevil, Hazbin Hotel) or Christians and anything Christian in an irreverent way (X-Men).

Christians have more to gain if they were more media literate, but that involves being more discerning than they’re used to.

Heatwave

I feel if Christians object to anything evil in Marvel and DC Comics, it’s usually either in the lines of the occult or homosexuality but not if said stories actually depict the Devil in a more heroic light. Especially when it comes to characters like Daredevil (who even dresses like the Devil himself), Blue Devil, Damian (Son of Satan) and Illyana Rasputina, which all constitute the elephants in the room or perhaps whales as whales are bigger than elephants. The fact that the Devil can appear as an angel of light so appearing as a superhero is within his reach, so much so he took advantage of it and aroused as little controversy from Christians as possible.

Kind of unfortunate how many Christians resort to the easier targets, but forget the Devil hiding in Marvel Comics in plain sight. I think it’s got to do with the way the Devil makes himself appear so lovable and innocent, especially with characters like Matt Murdock (who is blind by the way) that it can be this easy to forget his actual intention. Matt Murdock seems like a lovable figure, he is disabled twice by visual impairment and mental health issues, he strives to do the right thing but the problem is not only does he dress like the Devil he lives in Hell’s Kitchen.

Although Hell’s Kitchen is a real place, but since Satan lives in Hell one would wonder if this is his way of catching people off-guard as to remain unnoticed by Christians for longer than it should. What’s more innocent to any Christian than a superhero? This is how the Devil manages to avoid much attention from Christians when it should have, it seems like he’ll do anything to tempt people into loving and worshipping him (unfortunately I have, so I lost dogs along the way). Becoming a Daredevil fan is one way of the Devil making somebody love him, which is no good whatever you look at it this way.

When it comes to something like Marvel Comics, when characters like Damian, Daredevil and Mephisto are taken in aggregate they all constitute a parody of the Holy Trinity. Damian Hellstrom is the Son of Satan, so this makes Daredevil Satan the Father and Mephisto Satan the Unholy Spirit. One would wonder if other characters like Illyana and Satana vie for being the Devil’s equivalent to the Virgin Mary in some way, but whatever you look at it it seems the Devil has found a way to influence people without being noticed much. Surprisingly not by most Christians.

Which means they’ve been so seduced by the Devil that they don’t know what’s been done to them, that they forget which else to target for promoting evil in some way that it’s not a surprise that superheroes for most of the part don’t constitute a major target for them even when some qualify. I believe there are other ways the Devil makes something innocent undermine Christian/Biblical values, but where they also fly under Christians’ radar. Especially in Marvel when it comes to certain characters like Kate Pryde for instance.

This character has a habit of losing her temper a lot and repeatedly gets into fights with Professor Charles Xavier, who’s not only older but also the figurehead of his team the X-Men (which she is a part of). The fact that younger people are instructed to respect older people is something Kate defies a lot, is something Christians should also take notice of but never got around to because of how the Devil distracted them a lot. So you have something like X-Men, another story that more Christians should object to for a number of reasons they do with others, but something that flies under their radar far longer than it should have.

(It’s also surprising that Kate never gets any major repercussions for her disobedience to Xavier, in fact she often gets what she wants is kind of anti-Biblical when you think about it.)

The fact that one of the X-Men’s major enemies is a Christian pastor is something more Christians should notice, if because one of the writers working there might have an anti-Christian agenda. This might’ve been covered by a video series before, but I feel the X-Men’s just as deserving of the scorn Harry Potter unfairly gets by many Christians. I don’t even like Harry Potter but even then it’s unfair that it gets blamed a lot for things like witchcraft, when X-Men has done something similar and promotes more things Christians object to like evolution and even Catholicism. It’s surprising why they never bothered to criticise X-Men the same way.

Let alone in larger numbers that it deserves to, but that would mean the Devil caught them off-guard. To the point where they don’t even notice whenever he does make an appearance in something like Marvel Comics, especially when he makes himself into a superhero like Daredevil for instance. He’s even known as the Guardian Devil, where guardian angel should’ve been. Logically the Devil is the angel without fear of God, you should know this by now. At this point, we should really raise the bar for what is good and acceptable to God. We can’t just let DC Comics and Marvel get away with having demon heroes around.

If we can’t let them get away with things like witchcraft and LGBTQ matters, we shouldn’t also let them get away with blatantly anti-Christian characters, bratty heroes who get no repercussions for their actions and having demonic heroes around. But the fact that superhero media seems so innocent and lovable, as if our bar for what is good and acceptable to God has lowered a lot. The fact that we get distracted by whatever we like makes it this easy to lower the bar for what is good and pure, regardless if it manages to make somebody sin in one way or another. One could lust at an artbook, especially for the nudes.

The fact that others didn’t object to the other things I did, especially if it seems innocent like an art book makes me think their bar is low in some situations. Lower than it should be, because that’s how the Devil distracts us by presenting us something innocent and readily sanctioned. If the Devil is clever then he’s clever enough to present us something innocent, the better to tempt us this way and sometimes it could involve superheroes as he would with art books. We shouldn’t make stuff that causes others to stumble, but that involves being more careful with what we do.

But if many of these publishers and corporations consecrate their stuff to the Devil, then it’s as if they’re deliberately out to destroy as much people as they can. It needn’t to be overtly violent or pornographic to get them to sin; I think the more innocent something worldly and sinful it appears to be, the more deceptive it gets as to let the Devil get a hold of us. And if somebody like Walt Disney purposefully created something to spiritually destroy people with, then he has succeeded in lowering people’s bars for what is pure and holy. People like Stan Lee have continued this in some way.

Especially when it comes to enabling people’s idolatry of fictional characters like Spider-Man and Iron Man, even if they themselves weren’t based on demons but if they encourage idolatry of them then it’s as if they give themselves to the Devil and do whatever he wants them to do. That’s to spiritually destroy as much people as possible, this is not a good look for those who proclaim to be Christian such as Brian Littrell. Like as if they’re so proud of the attention they’re getting, to the point where it ruins them spiritually as well and no sooner or later they’ll reap the whirlwind.

It’s not wrong to like superheroes, Disney or whatever but we shouldn’t let them become idols lest we forget the Creator and not the blessings, but when Marvel and DC have a number of demonic heroes in their echelons then it’s not a good sign because the Devil will use anything innocent to beguile people with. It needn’t to involve witchcraft, mythical creatures and the like to be satanic, the Devil himself could turn into a superhero and still not be noticed by this many Christians like they do with Harry Potter. Perhaps our bar’s too low in some situations, if we object to Harry Potter then we should do the same with X-Men.

They’re both morally equivalent when it comes to condoning the things Christians are taught to abhor and more, but it seems we tend to be more conditional when it comes to what we abhor. If it seems innocent, regardless if it makes somebody sin, then we take this for granted. As if we’ve lowered the bar for what is acceptable, to the point where the Devi likes it this way.

American Imperialism, Disney Style

There’s a book called ‘How to Read Donald Duck’ and it does examine how the Carl Barks stories espouse a form of colonialism, especially whenever ‘exotic’ locales are concerned where they are often exoticised and othered in ways they wouldn’t be when left to their own. It’s like how the Africans in the Carl Barks stories are portrayed in a demeaning, primitive manner and a cursory glance at African countries in those days show that there is room for modern technology. There are newspapers, radio stations, television channels and book publishers in African countries after all, then comes the Internet and it’s no different really.

I myself have perused African newspapers and radio stations, I still do to this day but for the purpose of worshipping God. Disney, as an American multinational corporation, has multiple branches almost anywhere in the world. It has many divisions dedicated to different media in whatever permutation they appear in, it even has a series of radio stations called Radio Disney and they’re still a thing in Latin America, including Ariel Dorfman’s native Chile (just type emisoras.cl/disney). Disney comics used to be a big thing in both the Americas and are still a thing in places like Brazil and Europe.

The Disney comics are a major focus of Dorfman’s thesis, though if he wrote this book this time he would’ve certainly included Radio Disney and critiqued it the same way. It’s not hard to say that even when Disney has improved itself when it comes to portraying foreign countries and culture, there’s still the potential for othering in ways it never intended to. Looking at one of its purchases like Marvel, it’s not hard to think some of Dorfman’s arguments could also be applied to characters like Black Panther and Storm to a frightening extent.

Because a chunk of Dorfman’s thesis is dedicated to the global north’s impression of global south countries, it’s not hard for one to come to the same conclusion considering Marvel has done the same thing. It’s like how someone has pointed out the problems with the way Marvel named its Vietnamese characters, it’s not that China didn’t influence Southeast Asia at all (it did to varying degrees depending on the country). But that their names are kind of strange and strangely spelt to anybody familiar with Vietnamese, sort of like how one came to this conclusion concerning Karma.

She has the ability to influence and possess people’s minds but what’s not brought up is that Marvel missed an opportunity to celebrate the Year of the Cat, it’s a thing in the Vietnamese zodiac and one that replaces the Year of the Rabbit for some reason, just so it could have a variant cover of Karma hanging out with cats. But this makes you wonder if most Marvel writers actually knew about Vietnam and Vietnamese culture in specific to do this, the best this writer did is to change her name into something realistically Vietnamese (it turned out in-story it’s a big mispronunciation of her real name).

Similar things can be said about Sha Shan Nguyen, who is a Spider-Man character by the way, one wonders why nobody bothered renaming her to San Sang since it sounds close enough (in my opinion as I’ve just started learning Vietnamese). Then we get to Storm or Ororo Munroe, who’s pretty much Marvel’s most famous Kenyan. But also one who’s hardly like actual Kenyans, especially if you actually know Kenya in some way. She doesn’t speak Swahili, Luo or Gikuyu to any degree, she doesn’t even celebrate Boxing Day (which happens every 26 December).

She’s a character who’s pretty much a white person’s idea of an exotic black woman, not so much an actual Kenyan woman which explains why she’s so oddly divorced from Kenyan culture. Also both Disney comics (especially when written by Carl Barks) and Marvel Comics sometimes have stories taking place in made-up Latin American countries, which further exoticises Latin America. It’s kind of shockingly recent for Disney to place its stories in actual Latin American countries, be it Mexico for Coco or Colombia for Encanto. But every now and then it falls back on exotic, made-up countries.

Recently we have Wish, which takes place in an island called Rosas. Though I think it would’ve worked just the same if it was actually set in Spain, despite having never watched the film myself. One would only wonder why does Black Panther have to come from Wakanda when he could’ve come from Cameroon and be Bamileke himself, the very people who even associate leopards with royalty and where fons/chiefs are said to become leopards themselves. Black Panther being an actual Cameroonian wouldn’t hurt really.

Cameroon even has websites which you can peruse such as Camerounweb, Actu Cameroun and more in addition to Radio Balafon (radio.co.cm/radio-balafon/). Or for another matter, Madripoor when it comes to the X-Men stories when Singapore could’ve sufficed. Using actual Latin American, Asian and African countries would have a major advantage, since you could actually look up on them and go there if you’re willing to. You could even peruse their websites, it’s not that hard really since I’ve done this before. If you could use the Internet to find X-Men fanfics, you could do the same with Senegalese websites.

I could go on saying that even when Carl Barks has been proven to be a good writer on most counts, when it comes to portrayals of nonwestern and nonwhite cultures it leaves much to be desired. The Africans in his stories tend to be stereotypical primitives, even when it was written there were actual Africans editing and publishing newspapers, writing for newspapers and using the radio themselves. There are even libraries in African countries, many of which have survived to the present day. Or how Donald and gang have a habit of going to made-up countries, when actual ones could’ve sufficed.

I feel we could’ve gotten stories where Donald and Uncle Scrooge would go to Afghanistan instead of Unsteadystan, though one would only wonder if even when the Internet wasn’t there yet in its present form Barks himself may have been more ignored than one realises and just as prone to Orientalism as his contemporaries at Marvel. So both Disney and Marvel act as agents of American media imperialism, both of them impart an American perspective of things onto non-Americans. Regardless of how suspicious their portrayals of foreigners are, they remain popular to the present day.

Because of the way Disney expanded and acquired brands like Marvel and Lucasfilm, we have an even more potential form of American imperialism as delivered by this company. We don’t just have Disney fabrics, comics, books and toys but also Radio Disney, Disney ships and Disney bridal wear. Even when Disney bothered to improve its portrayal of foreign, often non-western cultures but sometimes it still leaves much to be desired. In some properties like the Marvel stories, Wakanda takes priority over Cameroon and likewise Madripoor over Singapore.

The potential for exoticising, othering foreign regions is there and the precipice will always be there in some form, sometimes it’s so unavoidable that it’s easy to come up with Madripoor, Unsteadystan, Wakanda, Latveria, Rosas, Inca-Blinca, Aztecland and Kumandra than to actually set them in Singapore, Afghanistan, Cameroon, Slovenia, the Canary Islands, Peru, Mexico and Cambodia. It’s always the veneer of exoticism that others actual geopolitical regions, instead of the reality of such places as they actually are. A lot of it seems to come from an insincere interest.

Like trying to be interested in something foreign, but not actually committing to it in any way. I have done this before with China and it’s only now that I’ve gotten actually interested in it (with God’s help), it seems with some Marvel and Disney writers they want something foreign but can’t commit to it in any way. So Doctor Doom comes from Latveria, but not Slovenia (which actually exists by the way). A Yugoslavian Doctor Doom wouldn’t hurt, so would a Cameroonian Black Panther. Or Raya actually coming from Cambodia, but as one said these don’t have any messy real-world baggage.

I guess if Wish was actually set in Spain, one would have to deal with the messy complications of colonisation. After all it was Spain that colonised parts of Africa (Equatorial Guinea and part of Morocco), it was Spain that enslaved many Africans and have them forcibly going to its colonies to do work there. Likewise with Raya not coming from Cambodia, you’d have to deal with America having waged war there. Ethiopia could qualify but to my knowledge, it doesn’t have a tradition of associating leopards with royalty the way Cameroonian Bamilekes do.

Or for another matter, the messy reality of Singapore having seceded from Malaysia and the messy legacy of British colonialism in both countries. It seems with Disney over the years and whatever permutation it appears in, whatever company it has acquired there’s always the precipice of exoticism and othering. Geopolitical regions like Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and southern Europe find themselves exoticised by Disney, real countries could’ve sufficed but you have to deal with the ugly geopolitical reality we live in.

At best, Disney and its vassal companies promote an American way of looking at things. Rather othering and exclusive at that concerning foreign countries at all.

The Elephant In The Room

As I said before in ‘King Crimson’, it’s unfortunately common for Christians to ignore superheroes when it comes to the fight against witchcraft in fiction. They often go for the more obvious offenders, but one wonders if Satan likes it this way since he’s way more deceptive than one realises. If he can appear as an angel of light, he can also appear as a superhero. There are some people who say that characters like Batman, Spider-Man and Superman are all patterned after actual demons, to the point where by appearing as literal do-gooders they have successfully deceived people this way.

It might be possible for Christians to enjoy and create superheroes, I have created some of them myself but with Good Fight Ministries putting out a series on what I knew that it seems God knew how I felt. As if some Christians don’t hold superhero media to the same standard as they do with Harry Potter, like if you object to witchcraft in Harry Potter you should also do the same with X-Men which even has openly demonic heroes in its ranks. Nightcrawler is said to look like a demon, Illyana manipulates magic and sometimes looks demonic herself. If Spider-Man and Batman are said to be inspired by real demons, then it’s not off to assume that Nightcrawler himself is also based on a demon.

That Illyana sometimes looks like what you’d expect the Devil to be says a lot about how Satan will do anything to let our guard down, if because his methods are so unsuspecting that it’s likely why many Christians have ignored superhero media for a long time. Someone has gone on saying that by using fictions to lure in people, demons have successfully gotten unsuspecting folks to worship them. That some superhero writers are either involved in the occult themselves (Grant Morrison, Alan Moore) or are flat-out atheists (Warren Ellis) makes me wonder if there might be more ungodly people in the superhero industry than one realises.

Angelica Zambrano said about how some Ben10 characters are inspired by demons, so much so that it’s not a stretch to think the same thing is likely to be true for many DC and Marvel characters. Even if not all of them look demonic, but when you have eyewitness accounts of demons resembling familiar cartoon characters then it seems the well’s already poisoned. Spider-Man doesn’t look like a demon at first, but his signature hand gesture is the devil’s horns. I even think Spider-Man’s character design is a travesty of actual spiders, admittedly my spider knowledge is weak but I can’t help but wonder if Satan hates God’s creations in a particular way.

That animals can go to Heaven as they never sin, humans go to Heaven from being saved and stuff are what angers Satan a lot so he’ll do anything to corrupt and abuse them, so this is the likeliest and most unexpected reason for the existence of crush videos. Celestial kind of hinted at it at The Master’s Voice, where she goes on saying that some of the people who watch these are actually the rich and famous. The same people who give their lives to the Devil, to the point where as somebody said their lives are actually cursed. Perhaps if these are all true, then it really is a sick world after all.

King Crimson

When it comes to the Devil appearing as an angel of light, he’ll do anything to make himself appear so innocent as to go unnoticed for a long time. In fact, he likes it this way as to lure people better. I am also prone to this as well, so this time I’ll discern better. The Devil does take advantage of things we like, it could be older music for me, it could be superheroes for others. But the outcome is the same.

To give you an example that people barely notice or care about would be Marvel’s Daredevil*, it’s not just that he’s got the Devil in his name but also looks like him too. It’s only a matter of time that Marvel would introduce more openly demonic heroes like Damian (Son of Satan) and Illyana Rasputin, the fact that they all flew under the radar shows you how clever the Devil is. So much so that Christians keep on going after the more obvious targets.

Catholicism, LGBT, Harry Potter, you name it. Perhaps by going after the more obvious targets, that this is how the Devil evades detection by otherwise discerning Christians. He could appear as a superhero if he wanted to, which’s why we have characters like Blue Devil and Kid Devil. Both of them are superheroes and demonic ones at that. Even before I got saved, I knew how hypocritical of Christians to complain about Harry Potter when X-Men has done something similar.

In fact, the X-Men stories even openly demonise pastors. That’s something Harry Potter, to my knowledge, has never done. But the Devil likes it this way, so much so that most don’t care about it. He is so smart he’ll do anything to make people avoid noticing him and his tactics, if God is the greatest detective, then Satan’s the greatest escape artist. No wonder why we don’t see Christians complaining about superheroes so often.

Since so many of them appear so innocent that most Christians barely, if ever, care about the anti-Christian content put out by DC and Marvel. This is really how the Devil traps us, by using something so innocent and likable that they get deceived this way. It doesn’t have to be Harry Potter to do the job, when X-Men has done a better job at deceiving people. Not just with the demonisation of pastors, but also flaunting demonic heroes around.

One would wonder if by becoming a fan of Daredevil, Illyana Rasputin or Damian Hellstrom they might actually be worshipping the Devil without realising it, if so this might be part of the Devil’s plan to corrupt us after all.

*Let’s not forget that in German, he was known as Der Dämon or the Demon. While it’s an attempt to explain the double d on his costume, one would wonder if this gives away the Devil’s real intention.

Meridianism and the X-Men

The late Edward Said proposed the idea of orientalism, or practically how westerners view and manipulate perceptions of eastern cultures. In his case it’s the Middle East but it’s been expanded to include the Far East as well, I might as well propose something similar for Africa and it’s meridianism, from the Latin word meridiem or south as Africa is south of Europe. Much like how orientalism involve westerners projecting their ideas and thoughts onto eastern countries and cultures, meridianism is the same when it comes to African countries and cultures.

It’s meridianism when you see Africa as the land of hunters and wildlife, regardless of that much of African wildlife is either endangered or extinct (as it is with the Atlas brown bear). On top of that, Africa is becoming very urbanised. One of the most urbanised countries in Africa is Gabon, around 90.74% of Gabonese live in cities. Not to mention Africans aren’t always anywhere near how westerners expect them to be, not just in terms of poverty and being primitive but also how some Africans counter some westerners’ view of certain animals. Which is how meridianism works.

It’s not always about how Africans actually see themselves and their respective communities, countries and places as but rather how westerners view and wish them to be, but this involves denying them of any real agency or be themselves in anyway they like or see fit. This involves massively distorting African countries and cultures, as if they aren’t what they see themselves as.

It’s like you’re Western and you hate cats so you like it when Africans hate cats, but when some Africans actually like cats (I’m part of a Kenyan Facebook group for cat owners) or use them for pest control then that’s showing a meridianist viewpoint of Africa. It’s not how certain African countries actually see themselves as, it’s a gross distortion of who they really are and what they actually do. You might say these Africans shouldn’t be so westernised, but since English and French are western languages so Africans shouldn’t speak those either.

But that involves realising what the logical conclusion would be like, since Africa as a whole is largely impacted by European colonisation twice. Once in the premodern world and once in the modern world, since both Egypt and Morocco were colonised by the Romans before and Morocco got colonised by France alongside Tunisia and Algeria. That’s why French is also spoken and used there. Though this involves knowing a thing or two about African countries, especially with regards to its people.

Then we get to Marvel’s Storm, perhaps one of the best known merdianist characters of all time. For those who don’t know, Storm is part of the superhero team (and magazine) called the X-Men and predictably she manipulates the weather. But as Cheryl Lynn Eaton noted in this thread, Storm has been written by white people for such a long time that she’s detached from black cultures. To go further with this, the big problem with her is that she’s a white person’s idea of an exotic black woman.

Not so much an actual African woman, let alone an actual Kenyan woman at that (since she’s stated to be Kenyan herself). Somebody at Blue Corn Comics stated that characters like the Puerto Rican Cecilia Reyes and the South African Maggott are unable to break into the X-Men lineup and become popular, but I still think that’s because Storm plays into meridianist views of African women and cultures. As Storm is presented in the comics, she barely speaks a word in Swahili (despite being the other lingua franca in East Africa, alongside English of course).

This would’ve been fine if her monolingualism is addressed, but as it stands she’s often written by somebody who barely bothers (or rather, doesn’t bother learning) Swahili. On top of that, she doesn’t celebrate Boxing Day either. That’s the holiday after Christmas, as introduced by the British. As if most X-Men writers either have little experience with actual Kenyans or rarely read up on and from anything Kenyan that explains why Storm’s the way she’s written for a long time.

This is pretty much why Storm is an meridianist character, she is a character written by mostly white people for a long time that she’ll come off as really off to those who’re black. Meridianism to me, is orientalism if you replace the east with the south, and in this case it’s Africa we’re talking about. Storm, in some regards, is worse than Black Panther, if it weren’t for the fact that Kenya is real unlike Wakanda. Even if you say that I should criticise the writers, the way she’s written is still symptomatic of a meridianist imagination.

The way she’s written reflects western ideas of what Africans are like and out to be, not so much Africans as they see themselves as. Witness the difference between X-Men and something like Aya de Yopougon, the latter is Ivoirian but still shows what a comic book about Africans is like when written by actual Africans themselves. Or for another matter, the comic strips at Guardian.ng. The serious underrepresentation of Africans in US comics is pretty much why I turned to cartoons as done by black people.

Even if the Guardian cartoons aren’t your taste, they’re still more African than any X-Men story will ever be when they feature African characters. It doesn’t help when there aren’t any African, specifically Kenyan writers working on the X-Men that’s why Storm turned out the way she is. The lack of any Kenyan talent in the X-Men stories is why Storm’s a byproduct of a meridianist imagination. You might say that Kenya is obscure, so why would anybody bother researching it.

But the fact that countries like Kenya and Vietnam are real, so there should be more care put into characters like Ororo Munroe and Xian Coy Manh. They could easily represent their countries when you think about it, the only problem is that most X-Men fans and writers never bother looking up on those countries let alone in languages outside the ones they know best now that they have the Internet at their expense. Trust me, I use Google Chrome a lot because it translates non-English language webpages well enough.

I still believe some of the problems with the way Ororo’s written boils down to a meridianist imagination, that’s by projecting western ideas and perceptions onto African countries. Some of it’s due to sheer ignorance, which’s why you don’t see her celebrate Boxing Day every December. But even then when it comes to meridianism, like orientalism, the tendency to project western ideas onto African countries is attributed to ignoring what they really are.

Not all Africans eat cat meat and there are Africans who actually own and use cats the way westerners do like pest control, if Africans are westernised then colonialism is to blame and this includes the English language, itself a byproduct of British colonisation. Among the native African languages I can think of, these include Twi, Kikongo, Lingala, Fe’ef’e/Nufi, Swahili, Igbo, Yoruba, Tamasheq and Hausa. If we were serious about dewesternising Africa, then English, Portuguese and French have got to go.

I feel no matter how well-intentioned their attempts are at trying to educate and free Africans, some of it’s not rooted in a sincere interest in Africa and Africans. If they were really into Africa, then we shouldn’t get meridianist characters and stories like X-Men. Just as having a sincere interest in easterners and the east counters orientalism, a sincere interest in Africa and Africans counters meridianism. They have an idea about Africa, but it’s hardly what Africans understand Africa to be.

Meridianism is the sister of orientalism, both are western ideas of nonwestern countries. They’re not about how nonwesterners see their places of origin as, which strips them of the will to see their countries as they really are. Quite surprisingly, not a lot considered what would be the equivalent to orientalism when applied to sub-Saharan African countries, so I propose meridianism as the equivalent. It’s non-academic, but you should get the idea of it.

The Fame Monster

There’s this hour long video on YouTube called ‘Should Christians Listen to Taylor Swift‘ and somebody had this comment saying that fame might actually be more of a curse than a blessing, if this is true then this is likely why so many celebrities divorce, have mental health problems, cheat on each other, watch porn, do drugs and practise ungodly religious practices like astrology for instance. The problem is really the general public’s tendency to associate popularity in the arts (and sports) with success, not knowing that not everybody who learns either the arts or sports becomes very successful.

There’s a study done on Turkish footballers called Bullying in Football Experiences of Turkish Professional Footballers stating that not all footballers necessarily become rich and famous, many more toil in obscurity, they even get abused a lot and others never become professional athletes likely due to said negative experiences. Not that there’s anything wrong with liking sports, but the fact that there’s really a lot of abuse going on in those spaces should be enough to humanise athletes (especially team sports).

In the sense that not all athletes are necessarily that well-off in life, many get hazed a lot and some never become professional athletes because of that. There’s even another study called Bullying in School Sport where a good number of kids who do sports quit because of the constant bullying they face, I guess it’s easy to put athletes and artists on a pedestal because we think they’re superhuman or something. When in reality they’re pretty much peak human, incredible but still within human limits.

Again it’s not that I hate sports but that we tend to associate sports with fame and success, regardless if the athletes suffer or not. This is likely why in fiction, athletes don’t seem to get bullied much. If that study on Turkish footballers is any indication, to be athletic is to be superhuman, popular and successful in life regardless of the pain those in organised sports have to go through. It’s not always glamourous but that would mean athletes are only human, warts and all plus pain.

We don’t really see them as the people, the human beings they truly are. That is kind of objectifying in and of itself, not that they get sexualised a lot but that we rarely see them as people who make mistakes, do bad things and suffer a lot in life. Let’s not forget that there are some footballers who practise witchcraft to win, there’s even a study called How to win a football match in Cameroon : an anthropological study of Africa’s most popular sport that explains this.

Whilst not all footballers necessarily practise witchcraft to win, many are at best plain ignorant but in some sense footballers are sinners like everybody else. In the case with Michael Jordan, if you believe this person (Helder Luemba) he has a Christian mother who prays for his salvation but Air Jordan keeps on resisting her wishes as well as God’s that he’s destined to die anytime soon. He could even end up in hell if he doesn’t repent in any way, likely a consequence of his own misinformed actions at that.

I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong to love sports and athletes, just don’t make them into idols that much and you’ll be fine. Finer still if you also pray for their salvation, which is good with God when you pray for the unsaved. Now as for musicians who practise witchcraft or tend to be too sympathetic to it, if they keep on doing this without repenting and with the intent to insult God then they have committed the unforgiveable sin. Eternal sin is pretty much hardened and conscious opposition to the word of God.

I could have done this before, which is why the classmate I was going to marry got taken away. In the case with Taylor Swift, she could have been a practising Christian at some point. But the more she gave herself to the world, the more consciously sinful she’s become. This explains why the witchcraft and devilry references in her body of work has gotten more explicit, with one song (Willow) is said to sound like a spell and why there are several witchy remixes of it.

Then we get to Karma, which seems lyrically innocuous, until you get to the music video where she dons a devil mask. One even speculated that some of her lyrics may reference the Devil in some way or another, and here are their full words about her:

@ashb2404:


As much as TS is about her symbolism, ive always wondered if her lyrics are actually her way of saying what she is actually feeling towards the one who actually gave her the fame she has. One of the things about fame that i think we have gotten so backwards and the enemy has twisted up so well is that most people consider fame a blessing…. I truly believe its a curse… Its so easy to look at the lifestyle these people have and wish we had that, the money, the houses, the adoration of so many, but its all a curse… Its probably the biggest thing keeping those people from truly knowing their creator…

Then we have another comment about her music leading somebody to divination from another video clip called Does Taylor Swift CAST SPELLS On Her Listeners?!:

@itsjazzyjules


We can all pray for her and her fans. I was a Swiftie.. until last month when the Holy Spirit finally convicted me. Taylor is a mainstream artist that a lot of my Christian friends followed (and many still do follow). I should’ve dissected her lyrics on a deeper level (False God, Blank Space, yntcd, Karma, etc). Regarding willow, I have a story about it, and I’ve seen people who shared similar experiences, including Angela Ucci in her Heaven & Healing podcast, which I recommend you to listen. Ever since willow came out, I would play it on repeat and never stop. Soon after, I found myself turning to tarot cards and divination (something I have always been against but during those moments I was strangely drawn to them). I don’t blame her, I blame myself for listening. It took me four months to realize my mistake and pray for deliverance and leave divination behind – that obsessive feeling also went away. A lot of her fans are defensive saying she is a Christian. She mentioned it in her documentary, but her actions and anti-God lyrics suggest that her heart is far away from the Lord now. I believe she is a kind person – just not a believer. Her constant theme of ‘revenge’ and unforgiveness go against God.

I remember listening to a sermon on Citi FM (a Ghanaian radio station that I listen to every weekend) on how clever and wily the Devil is, and why we sometimes fall for things that are actually Satanic. My favourite example would be the X-Men, a magazine published by Marvel Comics. I had this suspicion on why Christians seemed to have this double standard, where they complain about how anti-Christian Harry Potter is but ignore X-Men’s anti-Christian stance. But this goes to show you how clever and subtle the Devil can get.

If the Devil can appear as an angel of light, then why not a superhero? Both DC and Marvel have devil heroes like Damian Hellstrom, Blue Devil, Illyana Rasputin (who sometimes appears demonic herself), Nightcrawler, Kid Devil and of course, Matt Murdock. It’s not just that he’s called Daredevil, he even looks like the Devil himself. But this also made me realise that I should be more careful with what I listen to, since Neil Sedaka and Louis Armstrong do reference the Devil in some way themselves too.

It’s probably a good thing that the Doobie Brothers got me into gospel music in some way, especially when it comes to their cover of ‘Jesus is Just Alright’ that got me into enjoying the Art Reynolds Singers and gospel music every Sunday morning a lot. So I really ought to be careful with what I consume, since some of it’s not very good. I have prayed for the souls of musicians, so it’s going to take time for it to happen when God wants it to.

But the basic takeaway is to be careful with what you consume, because of the things they do is anti-Christian whether if it’s witchcraft or anti-God and those people themselves are up to no good.

Bibliography:

Benjamin Diboué Mystical Practices of Footballers

Bullying Trends Inside Sport: When Organized Sport Does Not Attract but Intimidates

AN EXAMINATION INTO BULLYING IN THE ADOLSCENT SPORT CONTEXT

Research on the influence of sports participation on school bullying among college students—Chain mediating analysis of emotional intelligence and self-esteem

MICHAEL JORDAN, THE BEAST AND THE FALSE PROPHET, THE 7 ANGELS OF MISSION AND THE COMING HUNGER

Extremely bad

Even as a Christian, I still think it’s unfair that Harry Potter got all the flack while X-Men got off scott-free. No pun intended. I mean if you look at the X-Men comics more closely, there’s a strongly anti-Christian worldview that most people (even most Christians) ignore. Not just because it promotes the things Christians hate or fight against like evolution, but also because there are a lot of LGBT characters there, polyamory and openly demonic characters. The character Illyana Rasputin sometimes looks like a demon, practises magic and is one of the good guys. I personally feel you don’t see that many Christians protesting against X-Men is really because Satan works in much subtler ways than that.

It doesn’t have to be something that’s openly evil, all he has to do is use something as innocent as superheroes to seduce the unsuspecting. It takes a more sophisticated form of grooming to grab attention, even though its anti-Christian philosophy becomes more evident not just in having an openly demonic heroine but also because we see churches getting destroyed and Christians demonised in the world of X-Men. Almost no other superhero comic does this, actually not even Harry Potter has come close to doing this despite its use of magic. If you go over to Spirit Reports, you have people saying that demons can appear as superheroes. Satan can appear as an angel of light, it’s not a stretch that he can appear as a superhero when he wants to.

The fact that Christians have ignored the X-Men for so long makes you wonder how subtle the Devil gets away with influencing people, it’s pretty much why for all of Angelica Zambrano’s talk about demons appearing as Ben10 characters not a lot of Christians protest against superheroes the way they do with Harry Potter. Not to mention there are even testimonies by Christians who say that demons behind superhero comics make people queer or something, which explains why so many of them do smutty fanfictions based on the stories they like. There must be something wrong with them, even though so many Christians sleep over them. Almost to the point where the Devil successfully gets their attention, because it appears so innocent they don’t even suspect it.

Not saying you should be entirely against superheroes, but that you really have to be more careful around them. Especially if Satan’s tactics are subtler than this, to the point where if you’re going to avoid Harry Potter because it’s anti-Christian you should also avoid X-Men. In fact, you should avoid superhero media featuring openly demonic characters. If because this is how the Devil gets his way into people’s lives, he can make demons appear in superhero media when he wants to. They can even appear as superheroes themselves, be it Blue Devil or Illyana Rasputin herself. It doesn’t have to openly feature magic to have demons, if because demons sometimes deploy subtler methods than that.

It doesn’t get any subtler than using a superhero comic, which sadly only a few Christians have warned against.

This is why people don’t take Christianity seriously

I personally feel there are a lot of reasons why people don’t take Christians and Christianity seriously, a lot of it stems from things like hypocrisy and a gross misunderstanding of God’s character as well as how Christians come off to other people. Especially to those they’ve hurt the most, to the point where they even lose faith in God because of those experiences. I think there are some faults in Christians seeing Christianity as a relationship, because if it were taken logically then those who left Christianity evidently left an abusive relationship. It’s a relationship they don’t want to be involved in for long, due to so many negative experiences with it.

I also think Christians grossly underestimate how harsh God gets, despite his constant distaste for sin so bad that he even doles out suffering when he sees fit. Like they think he can’t be harsh because he’s such a loving God, but let’s face it he is harsh when he wills it to be. He has his own way of doing things, which means he can be stern and harsh when he wants to. The way Christians understand his personality is just the tip of the iceberg, I think the Christian concept of him as always so forgiving and kind wears itself thin whenever people deliberately sin, to the point he becomes cold and harsh out of necessity. If Satan’s lenient, then God’s stern. He always has been, always will be. But the idea that God is harsh is alien to Christians, even if it makes more sense to normal people this way.

If he is harsh and perhaps hard to please, it makes more sense to normal people because at least we get a better understanding of why he allows bad things to happen and why he tests people’s faith. If he isn’t easy to please, then we wouldn’t know that he knows what’s bad for us. But that would humanise him to the point where he seems fallible because he tends to get harsh real easily, even if it makes him more approachable and understandable to many unsaved, if I will normal people. If he isn’t harsh and stern, then it makes it easy to make light of sin. I feel admitting he can be punitive and tough makes more sense, far more sense than they’d realise.

Another reason why people don’t take Christians and Christianity seriously is that a good number of Christians are hypocritical, like how can they be so harsh on stuff that involves half-naked men yet be so comfortable with ‘artistic nudity’. I know somebody’s like that to me and partly the reason I ended up lusting after men in skintight clothing, I feel their reactions and actions sort of unintentionally shaped the way I ended up lusting after. I don’t think inconsistent actions help people’s struggle with lust, if because it actually worsens and contributes to it, however accidental it may be.

It’s actually simple, just keep away from what makes you stumble. But Christians who continue to be hypocrites will never get this, even though it’s necessary to keep somebody from lusting. Like say they get real aroused by nudes, that it’s necessary to take away nude art from them. Seems like Middle Easterners and Muslims got this well, many Christians don’t and that’s another reason why they’ll never be taken seriously by secular people. To go further with more examples of Christian hypocrisy, it’s like how Christians throw fits over Harry Potter but never do the same with X-Men.

Even though X-Men openly contains a lot of things they hate such as openly demonic characters (Illyana Rasputin being a heroine even), contempt for Christianity and belief in evolution, to the point where it’s actually unfair to always bash Harry Potter when they are others that are worthy of their ire. It doesn’t make sense, despite a few Christians who admit that there are demons appearing as superheroes and that superheroes could be just as suspicious as display of magic is. Deep down inside, Christians get too easily swayed by what they think is wholesome.

There’s an article at Gospel Coalition stating that no matter how wholesome Disney is on the surface, a good number of its films and media oppose Christian values. The same goes for superheroes, no matter how inoffensive they appear to be to most Christians many superhero stories increasingly oppose Christian values. There’s one Nigerian celebrity who reacted to a DC character coming out as bisexual, stating that parents should shield their children from the enemy (read: Satan) who’s out to influence their every value and belief. It doesn’t help that the only well-done Christian superhero that I can think of is Power Mark says a lot about how a lot of superheroes are created with secular values in mind.

Some get more blatant than others, especially if X-Men’s any indication. In fact, it can be said that X-Men’s increasingly built on anti-Christian values not just with the open belief in evolution but also having a demonic character as a heroine, churches being destroyed, demonised Christians and a lot of openly LGBT characters. All the more a reason to apply the same energy to X-Men as one does with Harry Potter, now that its author has been accused of transphobia. I think not many Christians, well the Christians I know, will not admit this because deep inside that involves realising they too could be bad influences.

But that involves becoming more consistent than they’re used to, something that at least normal people can see which Christians fail to. To write an essay about Christian hypocrisy would necessitate a much longer post or even a book, because I feel there are many examples of this going on. So much so that anybody else can see through this, it’s like the Bible’s stance on dogs. While positive portrayals of dogs do exist in the Bible, they are few and far in-between the most negative mentions. I actually think any African country and society that associates dogs with witchcraft are logically the more consistent ones, since the Bible does mention dogs and sorcerers together.

Not that you should hate dogs, but that goes to show you how many Christians tend to be hypocritical. There’s a lot of inconsistency that’s enough to sour people on Christianity, like how can they condemn one thing and condone the other especially if it’s rather similar or regarded similarly. Make it make sense, that’s so simple. I personally feel if Christians are going to be more consistent, that involves stepping up their game big time and make good with it. I don’t think Christians are going to be comfortable with this, especially if it involves some of the things they love like say art without knowing it can be a stumbling block for other people. Even if it’s rather simple, they will not get this.

They’re too stupid to get this at all, pardon my words but it’s true.

Botched potentials

When it comes to characters with botched potentials, especially those coming from DC and Marvel, that I feel some of it’s got to with the way the character’s usually portrayed that undermines their potentials to be more than that. I feel when it comes to DC’s Stephanie Brown, some of the problems lie with portraying her as a giddy bimbo regardless of the fact that she sewed an outfit all to her own means writers are way better off portraying her as Batman’s answer to Edna Mode. Edna Mode is this Pixar character who designs outfits for superheroes, considering she knows how to sew she should ought to learn how to sew clothes for everybody else in the Batfamily.

In fact, she should be something of a butt-kicking Edna Mode considering she has trained under Cassandra’s wing for some time now. You might say this makes her into a Mary Sue, but in reality that’s showing something realistic. In the sense that there are things she’s real good at like sewing and things she’s gotten the hang over such as fighting, it’s not that hard if only writers took sewing seriously and she should be to sewing what Barbara is to computers. It’s not even a stretch for her to turn sewing into a business, something she could do by using Batman’s money alone. It’s not that hard for as long as you take sewing seriously.

I guess some of the problems with the way Stephanie’s written is that they kind of forget that there are things she might be really talented at, something that would’ve been remedied had they portrayed as sewing and mending costumes for the entire Bat-family. It’s not that hard really, if they also know how to sew themselves. Then you have characters that could easily go to a darker route, if only writers had the guts to go with that. Something like Marvel’s Kate Pryde becoming the X-Men’s resident assassin/hitwoman which kind of happened in Age of Apocalypse, not so much in the usual continuity even though it’s the most sensible direction to take her to.

She’s killed someone before, so having her kill people on the job would be a logical choice. Especially considering the ability she has, which’s well-suited to it really. If Invisible Woman’s powers actually lend themselves to security (if only they considered this), Kate’s own are perfectly suited to assassination and theft when one thinks about it. I guess if writers did take what’s logical for Kate to go to, it would be much darker than they would’ve wanted, especially when it comes to Age of Apocalypse, perhaps that’s why they shy away from turning her into a full-blown assassin for good in the normal continuity.

I guess why some writers don’t bother taking characters to where they’d logically go’s that either they’re held back by preconceptions of what they should be even when they can like with Stephanie Brown, or that the logical conclusion’s the more undesirable one like with Kate Pryde. There are also things that are beyond the writers’ knowledge, I guess it’s too much for some writers to know a thing or two about sewing when they don’t. Maybe that’s why they never bothered having Stephanie own her sewing skills to the point where she’d even make costumes for people and even turn it into a business with Batman’s funding.

Even if that’s the most sensible direction to take her to.