Indigenous Reimagingings

When it comes to indigenous characters, they’re not necessarily entirely nonexistent in fiction. But when there’s so few nonstereotypical representations of them, to the point where some people would reimagine or ‘headcanon’ certain characters as indigenous. I have done the same thing but with Tora Olafsdotter (aka Ice) in 2011, since unlike Ice People the Sami actually exist in the far north of both Sweden and Norway. They are a legitimate indigenous ethnic minority that practise reindeer husbandry, their own languages have been threatened so a language revival of sorts is in order.

It’s not that Sami characters don’t exist in fiction at all but outside of Disney’s Frozen as well as Swedish and Norwegian media, they’re practically nonexistent in DC Comics. You might say that they’re obscure so they’re not worth appearing, but when Disney bothered to out one character as Sami and add more of them so representation really does matter. One of the Frozen films even got translated in a Sami language I think, so this says a lot about how desperate some people are for representation as well as finding a way to preserve and revive their indigenous languages.

DC could’ve done the same with outing Tora as Lule Sami or Southern Sami, but that would mean that the Ice People are pretty nonexistent whereas the Sami are real. Surely DC is home to fantastical races and cultures, but when the Amazons themselves are fantastical American imaginings of Greek culture. You know references to ancient Greek culture and Greek mythology abound, so they’re going to be Greek-coded and in ways that become more obvious to those who know a thing or two about Greek culture. Tora Olafsdotter could’ve had a shot at being DC’s first Sami-coded character.

Indigenous representation does matter, but sometimes in ways we don’t realise. The Sami people, for most of the part, don’t look much different from non-Sami Swedes and Norwegians and they even intermarry each other. The differences between them and the latter is more the ones between the Cornish and the non-Celtic English, it’s not an exact similarity but one that gives you an idea of what the Sami really are in relation to mainstream Norwegian and Swedish societies. Or for another matter, what the Frisians are to the Dutch but it’s still the same point.

Certain ethnicities are either underrepresented or misrepresented in fiction, both born out of prejudice and sheer ignorance of who they really are as people. I don’t think the Sami are that well-represented in DC Comics, though I think it’s nice if DC outed Tora Olafsdotter as Sami since they are a real ethnic minority in Sweden and Norway. Nicer still if she’s not a stereotype, but it’s better than nothing.

It’s not your land

When it comes to discussions about illegal immigration to North America, let’s not forget that white Americans and Canadians themselves are the scions and descendants of immigrants which makes some of their anti-immigrant rhetoric hypocritical in light of the indigenous populations there. Though it could be argued that indigenous North Americans are also descendants of immigrants since the Ice Age, but when they came here first and stayed in North America longer that’s when it gets thorny.

To put it this way, this is like claiming a house you’ve just stayed there as your house regardless if that’s actually somebody else’s house first. North America was settled by indigenous people first and longer than white people have ever done, therefore you must show more respect and understanding to these people. Unfortunately they’re subjected to prejudice and mistreatment, whether if it’s the phenomenon of missing indigenous women, children sent to boarding schools, indigenous women being raped and/or sterilised and the like.

As for the Sami in Finland, Norway and Sweden it is similar in that they came to these places first, ahead of their Nowegian, Finnish and Swedish counteprarts. They’ve even be othered a lot, even though they were here first. When it comes to indigenous people and immigrants, they can get along but when it comes to anti-immigrant rhetoric it becomes hypocritical to distrust immigrants as a descendant of immigrants. Especially if indigenous people came here first.

Conflicts between activists and Indigenous people

The conflict between animal rights activists and Inuit people (as well as Indigenous Canadian people in general to some extent) is well known as it’s practically a struggle between animal rights (as endorsed by a white or non-Inuit/non Indigenous majority populace) and a minority that’s reliant on fur for clothing and meat for survival. The Dene people for instance have a culture built on making fur and leather/animal hide clothing, that’s not to say they never relied on plants to make clothing but like with the Inuit the climate and geography they’re in isn’t favourable for mass production of plant fibres for clothing the way it would be in Mexico.

(The Aztecs for instance used maguey for commoners’ clothing and cotton for royalty.)

A good number of fur trappers in Canada are Aboriginal and Metis (mixed race Aboriginal and white European), so the use and production of fur garments is common to several if not all First Nations communities and cultures. Among the Ojibwe people, they believe that animals willingly themselves as presents to people so the use of fur, meat and leather plays into this. That turns the animal rights’ idea of animals as beings lacking agency on its head where what if animals consented to being used for meat and fur. There are also people, regardless of their ethnicity, who believe that animals can be humanely harvested for their fur and meat.

I think with wool, that’s meeting things halfway in my opinion as you’re using animal fur without skinning and killing the animal but in the context of indigenous Americans, that’s something the Navajo and Quecha people indulge in as they have a history of animal husbandry so they rear animals for their wool (sheep for Navajo, llama and alpaca for Quecha). These two live south of Canada and they come from environments that are favourable for grazing and cultivating plant fibres (if they use them at all). As far as I know about the Dene and Inuit, these are the indigenous people who’re heavily reliant on fur and leather for clothing.

I could say some of the same things about the Sami in Norway, Sweden and Finland where while some of them could’ve adopted the habit of goatherding, farming linen and shepherding from the Nordic Vikings others continued to harvest and rear reindeer for leather and fur, which some still do today so it does say a lot about the importance of reindeer to their cultures. You might argue that culture and cultural attitudes can and do change, which they do but for other cultures fur and animal hides are important to their cultures that taking away their livelihoods involves taking away their culture.

Not to mention some parts of Canada where the Inuit live have high rates of suicide and unemployment, so speaking from my own experience with unemployment and mental illness it’s better for them to have something better to do even if it’s not something animal rights activists like than to have them do little else and wallow in their pain. The fact that animal rights attitudes are practically neo-colonialist and indigenous cultures have been impacted by Westernisation, so it’s better to hold onto your culture and not kowtow to Westernisation much.

Indigenous people and Samis have been pressured to lose their languages and customs that it’s hurtful as it’s something they love and share in their cultures, not to mention it’s disrespectful. So respecting their cultures is important as much as preserving and sharing them do.

The Immigrants

I actually think Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark are less ethnically homogenous than Iceland but then again Iceland was isolated for many years, given how afar it is even from other Scandinavian countries whereas the other four have been dealing with coexisting minorities for years, even if they’re not less racist either.

Three of them have the longstanding Sami communities as well as all three and Denmark having Romani communities (but that’s because those folks were deported from England to Scandinavia in the early modern years), if anything it’s Iceland that recently experienced receiving any immigrants.

Whereas the others have dealt with the Romani for years, sometimes discriminating otherwise innocent individuals (well, the three did the same to Sami folks). Then again, Norway and Sweden have also received Finnish immigrants (all Scandinavian countries were part of one kingdom before, Finland was part of Sweden).

Likewise there are Swedish enclaves in Finland and since Finland was also part of Russia, expect some Russian Tatar and non-Tatar communities thriving there, that and Jewish communites in most Nordic countries. That still proves my point that to my knowledge Iceland received immigrants very recently, much more recent than its contemporaries.

Some differences between Nordic nations

As for the differences between Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Norway I may have to carefully elaborate on the differences as I don’t have much experience living in those places, that the easiest one’s a matter of history and geography. Iceland was part of Norway, which in turn was part of Denmark whereas Sweden conquered Finland (hence why there are Swedish-language enclaves in the latter).

Logically, Denmark has influenced Norway where there’s a dialect closer to Danish. Of all the countries, only Finland and Iceland have presidents whereas Norway, Denmark and Sweden are governed by monarchies. All Scandinavian countries have islands, but Iceland’s the only island nation within Scandinavia and one with volcanoes to boot.

Denmark might have arctic outposts (Faroes, Greenland) but Denmark the peninsula has the most hospitable climate and ecology of all the Scandinavian countries, which should make sense as Sweden, Finland, Norway and Iceland are all practically underpopulated due to both harsh land conditions and with the three, they also have more land areas too.

Sweden might have technically more people than Denmark does but because Denmark has less land area, Denmark is the most densely populated of all the Scandinavian countries. (Iceland might be just as big as Denmark but due to harsher geographic conditions, only Scandinavia gets to be this densely populated.)

Then comes the cultural differences, being an outsider I’m not that well-versed in knowing the big differences. Whatever differences they have, this would be like pointing out that Denmark has Lego and Rasmus Klump, Iceland has Bjork and Lazytown, Sweden has ABBA and Ikea and Finland has Moomin and Norway has M2M and Nemi.

(That would involve any real familiarity with those countries to tell apart, however by proxy.)

Iceland, being so isolated, even if Icelanders are the descendants of Britons and Vikings but being so far apart that they’d end up being the only ones there on the place until recently. This isn’t to say Finland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden are any less xenophobic but they’re a lot less isolated and they have had history with ethnic minorities, even if it’s not always any better.

Finland, Norway and Sweden have the longstanding Sami communities, that even if they don’t always treat those right, there are attempts to recognise and preserve minority cultures (however with any country with minorities or minority languages) whereas Denmark, due to its closeness to Germany, actually has a Germany community.

Iceland would be rightfully this homogenous in the sense that it’s so isolated from most countries that the only inhabitants for years would be the descendants of Britons and Vikings. Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway are slighly less homogenous if because they’ve had cohabiting ethnic minorities like the Sami and Romani for years.

(Possibly any degree of intermarriage to the point where it’s not uncommon for Samis to have non-Sami relatives, inlaws and spouses.)

South African Lives

I guess of all the Sub-Saharan African countries out there, it’s South Africa that’s got a substantial white population which was at some point the ruling ethnicity. It doesn’t matter if they’re a minority but when they hold disproportionate power over the majority ethnicity it does feel unfair as well as almost disingenous. Maybe that’s not the right word for it and I’m somewhat in the dark about South Africa.

(To be honest, I’m more familiar with Cameroon, Uganda, Ghana, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya.)

But when it comes to South Africa, well if/when white people despite being a minority have a disproportionate say on the majority it not only feels unfair but also jarring. Especially when it comes to representation. I suspect that’s also similar in Brazil where although a significant number are black they’re disproportionately underrepresented in the higher ups.

Whilst it wouldn’t be any better in other African countries either, it’s possibly more analogous to what Arabs and Berbers have in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. If Berbers are the majority ethnicity yet Arabs are the ruling ethnicity, it’s inevitably unfair to the majority group (though it wouldn’t be any better if such ethnicities are the minority, if America and Sweden are any indication).

That they’re forced to assimiliate to those overlords and scour for whatever representation they have is enough to feel harshly unfair. This maybe changing but I get the impression of discrimination against Berbers in North Africa to be similar to what Bantus are getting in South Africa. The majority get discriminated sometimes for all the little things they do.

(Similar things have happened to minorities like Bretons, Samis and African Americans, Anglophone Cameroonians or Irish speakers in Ireland before.)

They’re sometimes unsupported and underrepresented in positions of power though that may be changing now. But when such ethnicities, majority or minority, get underrepresented that it feels as if they’re seen as none of a big deal. Even when they do matter in some way and they’re people just like everybody else.

It seems discrimination’s the same, whether if it’s aimed at disadvantaged majorities (Berbers, South African Bantus) or minorities (Bretons, African Americans, Samis).

Razib Khan and hair and eye colour percentages

I think part of Razib Khan’s own suspicions, though I could be projecting, might owe to his non-Western background and why he seems to favour the brown-eyed woman thing more. But in the sense that Western beauty ideals are pretty much and nonsensical elsewhere. I think I remember one survey in the late 2000s or early 2010s conducted on Japanese men and it said that most Japanese men seemed to favour black hair more than (dyed) blond hair.

It’s not that blond/lighter hair in general’s unattractive, it’s just not going to have the same girl next door appeal black hair and relatively lighter skin does. (Made worse by stigma over albinism, famine, delinquents bleaching their hair and Westerners so blond hair’s going to be othered in ways they’ll never be in the West.) Attractive but also oddly unapproachable even if it goes against their personalities.

In one study he linked, it seemed the percentage of light brown/dark blond hair’s almost about equal between the sexes among Icelanders and Dutch though in the Dutch group the percentage of blond hair among women’s lower whilst the Iceland replication group’s higher. Interestingly, the percentage of dark brown hair’s higher among women too (he also noted it in a study on Finnish individuals).

The studies where it states that women are likelier to have blond hair actually come from Britain, via the British Biobank so this might not be true for other populations and I’m not surprised if a future study comes up and agress with what (and Mr Khan) are saying should it be conducted anywhere else in Europe and Eurasia.

Russia’s somewhat trickier in that it’s got a large population from a country with an even larger land area so there’s a high chance that populations would be highly localised. So certain populations might have their own genetics, including what causes blond or red hair (whether if it’s KITLG, a form of albinism or MC1R).

Not to mention if Icelanders were believed and confirmed to be descended from Britons, it’s unsurprisingly that they would be genetically closer and also closer in hair colour distribution whereas Germans, French, Lowlanders, Swiss, Austrians and Northern Italians would cluster together (as with Finns, Samis, Norwegians, Danes and Swedes). But then again Icelanders are also descended from peninsular Scandinavians so they should represent an intermediate population.

(Logically, Russians, Poles and Ukrainians might be intermediate between Turks, Indians, Armenians and most Europeans proper. Unsurprisingly, Russia borders the rest of Central Asia.)

So the hair colour percentages per sex in France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Northern Italy should parallel their Lowland counterparts and logically Swedes to their Finnish and Sami counterparts. Icelanders would parallel Britons with Russia between very much between Finland and Armenia.

Germany and Sweden

Like I said before, Germany’s obviously going to be culturally and geographically closer to Italy, Austria, Switzerland and France. If it sounds odd, both Germans and Italians rank high in pessimism, individualism and masculinity. Both of them were fascist and there are even German-speaking communities in Northern Italy.

Italy has been subjected to Holy Roman Empire influence to varying degrees whether as actually part of it (this includes Southern Italy in relation to the Kingdom of Spain, which was part of HRE) or as a wartime partner (especially Venice). The same can be said of its relations to France. I also forgot to mention that Germany and France are also similar to Belgium and Netherlands.

(Even Netherlands has the same problems as Germany does when it comes to certain forms of animal abuse and Netherlands itself used to be part of the Kingdom of Spain.)

The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Austria and Scandinavia have a shared Germanic origin but they’re also highly divergent in some regards. UK as well as the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland and Alpine Germany have varying degrees of Celtic influence (and learning Scottish Gaelic and listening to Irish folk music are popular in Germany).

That’s not to say these are nonexistent elsewhere in Europe. But Sweden’s inevitably going to have more of a non-Indo-European influence if it weren’t for the Samis and Finns. The former being the long-standing indigenous minority (but one that’s practically indistinguishable from most Swedish citizens and analogous to what the Frisians to the Dutch).

The latter being their neighbour and former colony. Differences in the degree of gender equality’s inevitable. Differences between Norway, Finland and Sweden are bound to happen (in relation to history and geography). But they’re bound to be more similar to each other (to whatever extent) than they do with Germany.

(Again proving my point that Germany’s more like Italy and Austria.)

The Arctic World: Its Plants, Animals, and Natural Phenomena. With a … (Google Books, Again)

CHAPTER VIII.

LAPLAND AND THE LAPPS.

APLAND, or the Land of the Lapps, which the Lapps themselves call Sameanda or Somellada, forms the north and north-eastern portions of the Scandinavian peninsula, and is divided between Sweden and Russia. Norwegian Lapland includes the provinces of Norrland and Finmark; Swedish, of North and South Bothnia; and Russian, of Kola and Kemi. The last-named has an area of 11,300 square miles, with a population of 9000; Swedish Lapland, an area of 50,600 square miles, with 4000 inhabitants; and Norwegian, an area of 26,500 square miles, with a population of 5000. We are here referring to the number of true Lapps; in each division the population would be largely increased if we included Finns, Russians, Swedes, Norwegians.

Lapland, for nine months in the year, is blighted by the rigour of a winter climate. The summer months, when the sun does not set for several weeks, are July and August; and these are preceded by a brief spring, and followed by even a briefer autumn. Cereals do not thrive higher than the sixty-sixth parallel, with the exception of barley, which is cultivated as far north as the seventieth. The greater part of the country comes within that wooded zone which we described in an earlier chapter, and the forests, consisting of birch, pine, fir, and alder, spread over a very extensive area. On the mosses and lichens which grow abundantly in their shelter, are fed the immense herds of reindeer which constitute the principal wealth of the inhabitants.

The Lapps may almost be regarded as a nation of Lilliputians. Their men seldom exceed five feet in height, while the majority are some inches below that very moderate stature; and the women are even shorter. They are, however, a robust race, with muscular limbs, and unusual girth of body, the circumference of their chest being nearly equal to their height. Their complexion is dark, tawny, or copper-coloured; their dark, piercing, deep-sunken eyes are sot very wide apart, so as to communicate a peculiar character to the physiognomy. The wild, strange effect is further increased by the unkempt masses of dark, lank, straight hair which droop on either side of the whiskerless, beardless face. The cheek-bones are prominent, like those of a Celtic Highlander; the nose is flat; the mouth wide, with thin compressed lips. It may be supposed that the Lapps, from these indications, are not models of masculine or feminine beauty; and Dr. Clarke asserts that, when aged, many of them, if exposed in a menagerie, might be mistaken for the long-lost transitional form intermediate between man and ape. And, certainly, there is something repulsive in the constant blinking of eyes rendered sore by the pungent

198 AMONG THE LAPPS.

smoke of their huts, or the white glare of the snow, as well as in the expression of obstinacy and low cunning which one reads in every feature.

An aristocrat might be proud of their small and finely-shaped hands; but their arms, like their legs, are disproportionately short, clumsy, and thick. Clumsy, we mean, in shape; certainly not in movement, for the extraordinary flexibility of their limbs is one of the traits by which a Lapp is easily distinguished.

Of the dress of the Lapps it is needless to say much. In winter it consists of bears’ skins, in which both male and female wrap themselves up, with the fur outward. In summer the men wear a sort of tunic, the poesk, made of coarse light-coloured woollen cloth, depending to the knee, butvbound about the waist with a belt or girdle. Their head-gear consists of a kind of fez, made of wool, and adorned with a red worsted band round the rim, and a bright red tassel. Their boots or shoes are cut from the raw skin of the reindeer, with the hair outwards, and they are peaked in shape. They are thin, and they have no lining; but the Lapp defends his feet and ankles from the cold by stuffing the vacant space of the boot with the broad leaves of the Carex vesicaria, or Cyperus grass, which he cuts in summer, rubs in his hands, and dries before using. The female costume resembles that of the males, but their girdles are gayer with rings and chains.

The Lapps are a superstitious race. Like all the Norse tribes, they believe in witchcraft; and of old the Lapland witches had a reputation which extended to England, for being able to ward off rain or disperse storms. The English seamen trading to Archangel frequently visited their coast in order to buy a favourable wind.

Many of the Lapps claim the ability to foretell future events, and fall, or pretend to fall, into a trance or ecstasy, during which they see visions, utter prophecies, and unlock the secrets of those who trust to their divination. They also read the fortunes of inquiring dupes by means of a cup of liquor, or by the vulgarest jargon of palmistry. Superstition is the daughter of Ignorance. It is also the sister of Fear, for the superstitious are invariably prone to see supernatural signs and wonders in the appearances of the heavens, or to hear unearthly voices borne upon the midnight wind, and in everything they cannot understand to imagine the presence of some antagonistic power. As the American natives were panic-stricken at the occurrence of an eclipse, so the Lapps are filled with dread when the sky glows with the coruscations of the aurora.

These superstitions prevail in spite of the exertions of priests and schoolmasters. They are nourished in secret even when they are not openly proclaimed; and the Lapp, after listening devoutly to the harangue of his pastor, will return home to offer homage to his saidas, or wooden idols; to cower at the name of Trolls, the evil spirit of the forest; and to be deluded by the artifices of any so-called witch or fortune-teller.

There are Lapps, and Lapps; each, according to the region he inhabits, bearing his distinctive characteristics, and preserving his individual habits. Thus, there are the Fjalllappars, or Mountain Lapps; the Skogslappars, or Wood Lapps; and the Fisherlapps.

From the nature of the country the reader will expect, and will be right in expecting, that the Fjalllappars form the most numerous section. They are the nomads of Lapland, and their mode of life is entirely pastoral. As the Arabs with their flocks move from one oasis to another, or the Tartars with their cattle, so the Lapps migrate from place to place, compelled by the

THE LAPP AND HIS HUT. 1!>9

necessity of finding sustenance for their herds of reindeer. The mosses and lichens on which these animals feed are soon exhausted, and some time elapses before the half-frozen soil replaces them. The same cause operates to prevent the Lapps from assembling in large communities. Seldom more than three, four, or five families encamp in the same neighbourhood.

It will not be supposed that the temporary abode of a nomad exhibits any architectural completeness. Their tuguria, or huts, are of the rudest construction. They raise a conical framework, composed of the flexible stems of trees, and this they cover with a coarse kind of canvas, and in winter with the skins of reindeer and other animals. No doorway is required, and egress and ingress are provided for by turning up a portion of the canvas at the bottom, so as to form a triangular gap; and the portion so turned up is let down again at night. In the centre of the interior some large stones are piled together for a fireplace, and a square opening in the roof above carries off the smoke, and lets in the light and air—not to say rain, snow, and fog, when these prevail.

The tent or hut we have described generally measures about six feet in diameter, and eighteen to (twenty in circumference. It does not exceed ten feet in height. There is no floor, but the ground is covered with reindeer skins, and upon these the inhabitants sit or crouch by day, and huddle themselves up at night. The household utensils, implements, and weapons are suspended from the sides of the hut; and the clothing of the family, no very extensive stock, is preserved in a chest.

On a shelf or platform, raised high above the reach of dogs and wolves, between two neighbouring trees, the Lapp keeps his store of dried reindeer flesh, and cheese, and curds; for his diet is as plain as his general habit of living. His herd of reindeer he puts up at night, or when they are required for milking, in a large enclosure, about four hundred to five hundred feet in circuit, formed by a barrier of posts and stumps of trees, supporting a row of horizontal poles. Against the latter birch poles and branches of trees are placed diagonally, forming a kind of abattis, which is found to be a sufficient security against the attacks of wolves.

It is said that the milking of a herd of reindeer affords a lively and picturesque spectacle. When they have been driven within the area, and all the outlets closed, a Lapp, selecting a long cord or thong, twists both ends round his left hand, and then in his right gathers the thong itself in loose coils. Fixing on a reindeer, he flings the coils over its antlers. Sometimes the latter offers no resistance; but generally, on feeling the touch of the thong, it darts away, and its pursuer, in order to secure it, is called upon for the most vigorous efforts. And the scene is .animated indeed, when half-a-dozen reindeer, pursued by as many Lapps, sweep round and round the enclosure, until the former are finally overcome, or, as now and then happens, wrest the cord from the hands of the discomfited Lapp, and leave him prostrate on the ground. When the animal is secured, his master takes a dexterous hitch of the thong round his muzzle and head, and then fastens him to the trunk of a prostrate tree. The operation of milking is performed by both men and women.

As soon as the pasture in the neighbourhood is exhausted, the encampment is broken up, and the little company migrate to some fresh station. The rude tuguria are dismantled in less than half an hour, and packed with all the household furniture on the backs of the reindeer, who, by long training, are inured to serve as beasts of burden. On the journey they are bound together, five and five, with leather thongs, and led by the women over the mountains; while the

[blocks in formation]
father of the family precedes the march to select a suitable site for the new encampment, and his sons or servants follow with the remainder of the herd.

As spring verges upon summer, the Lapps abandon their mountain pastures, and move towards the shore. No sooner do the reindeer scent the keen sea-air than, breakinf loose from

O

all control, they dash headlong into the briny waves of the fiord, and drink long draughts of the salt sea-water. The Lapps consider this sea-side migration essential to the health of their herds. When summer reaches its meridian, and the snow melts, they return to the pleasant mountainsolitudes, ascending higher and higher, according to the increase of temperature. Then, on the approach of winter, they retire into the woods, where their great difficulty is to defend their herds and themselves from the attacks of the wolves. In this incessant warfare they derive much

[graphic][merged small]
assistance from the courage of their dogs. These are about the size of a Scotch terrier, with long shaggy hair, and a head bearing a curiously close resemblance to that of a lynx.

In the winter the Lapp accomplishes his journeys cither by sledging or skating.

Their skates are not exactly things of beauty, but they answer their purpose admirably. One is as long as the person who wears it; the other is about a foot shorter. The feet of the wearer are placed in the middle, and the skates, or skidds, fastened to them by thongs or withes. They are made of fir-wood, and covered with the skins of reindeer, which check any backward movement by acting like bristles against the snow. ‘It is astonishing with what speed the Lapp, thus equipped, can traverse the frozen ground. The most dexterous skater on the canals of Holland could not outstrip him. He runs down the swiftest wild beasts; and the exercise so stimulates and warms his frame that, even in midwinter, when pursuing one of these lightninglike courses, he can dispense with his garment of furs. When he wishes to stop, he makes use of

[blocks in formation]
a long pole, which is provided with a round ball of wood near the end, to prevent it from sinking too deep into the snow.

He is no less expert as a sledger. His vehicle, or pulka, is fashioned like a boat, with a convex bottom, so as to slip over the snow with all the greater ease; the prow is sharp and pointed, but the hind part flat. Perhaps it may better be compared to a punt than a boat. At all events, in this curious vehicle the Lapp is bound and swathed, like an infant in its cradle. To

preserve its equilibrium, he trusts to the dexterity with which he moves his body to and fro, and from side to side, as may be needed; and he guides it by means of a stout pole. His steed, a reindeer, is fastened to it by traces attached to its collar, and connected with the fore part of the sledge; the reins are twisted round its horns; and all about its trappings are hung a number of

[graphic][merged small]
little bells, in the tintinnabulation of which the animal greatly delights. Thus accoutred, it will perform a journey of fifty or sixty miles a day; sometimes travelling fifty miles without pause, and with no other refreshment than an occasional mouthful of snow.

With wonderful accuracy the Lapp will guide himself and his steed through a seem

ingly labyrinthine

wilderness, when the usual signs and characters of the landscape arc buried deep in snow. But his memory is tenacious, and a blighted tree, or a projecting crag, or a clump of firs, affords him a sufficient indication of the correctness of his course. He frequently continues his rapid journey throughout the night, when the moon invests the gleaming plains with a strange brilliancy, or the aurora fills both earth and heaven with the reflection of its wondrous fires.

A French traveller, M. de Saint-Blaize, is of opinion that the Lapps, like all savage and semi-civilized races, are rapidly diminishing in numbers. Yet this diminution is hardly owing to the conditions under which they live. Their life, to the civilized European, seems severe and almost intolerable; but though it is marked by privation and fatigue, it is not without its charms. It is free and independent, and without anxiety. As for the privation and fatigue, the Lapp is hardly conscious of them, because his capacity of endurance is great, and he is accustomed to them from his earliest years. Temperate, active, and inured to exertion, his physical frame is wonderfully vigorous, and he knows nothing of the majority of maladies which afflict the dweller in cities. One terrible disease, indeed, he does not escape, and this may have had much to do with their decline,—the smallpox. Otherwise, they are a healthy as well as a hardy race. If during a journey a Lapp woman gives birth to a child, she places the new-born in a frame of hollow wood, in which a hole has been cut to receive the little one’s head; then slings this rude cradle

202 THE LAPP HUNTERS.

on her back, and continues her march. When she halts, she suspends the infant and its cradle to a tree, the wirework with which it is covered affording a sufficient protection against wild beasts.

Professor Forbes, however, describes a more comfortable cradle, which is cut out of solid wood, and covered with leather, in flaps so arranged as to lace across the top with leathern thongs; the inside is lined with reindeer moss, and a pillow, also of reindeer moss, is provided for the head of the infant, who fits the space so exactly that it can stir neither hand nor foot.

The Lapp is a bold hunter, and will encounter the bear single-handed. Like the Siberian, he entertains a superstitious reverence for this powerful animal, which he regards as the wisest and most acute of all the beasts of the field, and supposes to know and hear all that is said about it; but as its fur is valuable and its flesh well-favoured, he does not refrain from pursuing it to the death, though careful, so to speak, to kill it with the highest respect.

Early in winter the bear retires to a rocky cave, or a covert of branches, leaves, and moss, and there remains, without food, and in a state of torpidity, until the spring recalls him to active life. After the first snowfall, the Lapp hunters seek the forest, and search for traces of their enemy. These being found, the spot is carefully marked, and after a few weeks they return, arouse the slumbering brute, and stimulate it to an attack; for to shoot it while asleep, or, indeed, to use any weapon but a lance, is considered dishonourable.

Hogguer, whose narrative is quoted by Hartwig, accompanied a couple of Lapps, well armed with axes and stout lances, on one of these dangerous expeditions. When about a hundred paces from the bear’s den, the party halted, and one of the Lapps advanced shouting, and his comrades made all the din they could. He ventured within twenty paces of the cavern, and then threw stones into it. For awhile all was quiet, and Hogguer began to think they had come upon an empty den; but suddenly an angry growl was heard.

The hunters now renewed and redoubled their clamour, until slowly, like an honest citizen roused from his virtuous sleep by a company of roisterers, the animal came forth from his lair.

At first he seemed indifferent and lethargic; but, catching sight of his nearest enemy, he was filled with rage, uttered a short but terrible roar, and rushed headlong upon him. The Lapp, with his lance in rest, awaited the onset calmly, while the bear, coming to close quarters, reared himself on his haunches, and struck at his antagonist with his fore paws.

To avoid these powerful strokes, the daring huntsman crouched, and then, with a sudden spring, drove his lance, impelled by a sturdy arm, and guided by a sure eye, into the creature’s heart.

The victor escaped with only a slight wound on the hand, but the marks of the bear’s teeth were found deeply impressed on the iron spear-head.

According to an old custom, the wives of the hunters assemble in one of their huts, and as soon as they hear them returning, raise a loud discordant chant in honour of the bear. When the men, loaded with their booty of skin and flesh, draw near, it is considered necessary to receive them with words of reproach and insult, and they are not allowed to enter through the door; they are compelled, therefore, to obtain admission through a hole in the wall. But when the animal’s manes have been thus propitiated, the women are not less eager than the men to make the most of its carcass; and after the skin, fat, and flesh have been removed, they cut up the body, and bury it with great ceremony, the head first, then the neck, next the fore paws,

INTEMPERANCE OF THE LAPPS.

203

and so on, down to the animal’s “last,”—its tail. This is done from a wild belief that the bear rises from the dead, and if it has been properly interred, will kindly allow itself to be killed a second time by the same hunter!

The principal article of food of the Lapps is reindeer venison. This they boil, and it supplies them both with meat and broth. In summer they vary their bill of fare with cheese and reindeer milk; and the rich eat a kind of bread or cake, baked upon hot iron plates or “girdles.” For luxuries they resort to brandy and tobacco ; and these are not less appreciated by the women than by the men. As for the latter, they are never seen without a pipe, except at meals; and the first salutation which a Lapp addresses to a stranger is a demand for “tabak” or ” braendi.” Dr. Clarke tells us that on paying a visit to one of their tents, he gave the father of the family about a pint of brandy, and as he saw him place it behind his bed, near the margin of the tent, he concluded it would be economically used. In a few minutes the daughter entered, and asked for a dram, on the ground that she had lost her share while engaged upon domestic duties outside. The old Lapp made no reply, but slily crept round the exterior of the tent until he came to the place where the brandy was concealed. Then, thrusting in his arm, he drew forth the precious bottle, and emptied its contents at a draught.

We find no great difference of habits existing between the Mountain Lapp and the Skogs or Forest Lapp, except that the latter takes up fishing as a summer pursuit, and devotes the winter months to his herds and the chase. But in course of time his herds demanding more attention than he can give to them, he is transformed into a Fisher Lapp, who dwells always upon the sea-coast, and is at once the filthiest and least civilized of the race. He resembles the Mountain Lapp in his love of tobacco and brandy. He differs from him in never migrating, and in wholly abandoning the pastoral life.

A picture of what the artists call a Lapland “interior,” of the domestic economy of a Lapp hut, is painted for us by the author of a recent book of travel, entitled “Try Lapland.”

After a long day’s journey, in the neighbourhood of Lake Randejaur, weary and cold, he and his companions came upon a small hut, and had visions of obtaining a night’s rest; but a closer acquaintance with the hut convinced them that such a proceeding would be undesirable.

For, knocking at the door, and pulling up the latch, they entered, to see before them a family scene!

[graphic]
FISHER LAPPS.

204 A LAPP INTEUIOR.

In an inconceivably dirty room stood a still dirtier beldame, making coffee. Her husband, an old man of seventy, sat on one side; while a hideous, deformed little Lapp, whether man or woman they could hardly tell, squatted on the floor on the other, in full costume, consisting of high-peaked blue cloth cap, and reindeer-skin dress, ornamented with beads and spangles. Her face was brown as a berry, long lanky black hair streamed down her cheeks; and, staring at the intruders, she begged for “penge” (money). Two young men were snoring in one bed, and two boys in another placed opposite to it, each being covered with a few reindeer-skins.

The entrance of the strangers aroused the sleepers to give one hasty look, and then they snored again.

The lady of the house offered coffee; and though everything looked so dirty as to create a positive feeling of disgust, the travellers could not afford to be particular, and accepted her offer, which put her in a perfect ecstasy of delight.

Quickly she scuttled off to the well for water, and, filling her kettle, set to work to roast fresh coffee.

The old man got up and endeavoured to rouse the sleepers, when he understood that the strangers were in immediate want of boats and rowers.

Leaving him to make the necessary preparations, they went out to take a look at the surrounding scenery; and returning in a quarter of an hour, expected to find them preparing the boats, which lay two or three hundred yards off. But, to their surprise, not the slightest change had occurred in the position of the sleepers; and, after drinking their coffee out of the one cup the Lapps possessed, they grow impatient, and stormed at the young men, trying even to pull them out of bed—but they would not budge.

“The father,” says our authority, “who protested great love for the English, but turned out the biggest rascal we had come across, was as anxious as we were that his sons should get up and row us ;—but not a bit of it! He told u;s that they had been out three days and three nights on the Fells, and were thoroughly exhausted. What was to be done, we could not think. It was getting serious; we certainly could not sleep in this dreadful hole, and there was no other shelter near.

“Money had no power: though I showed the almighty dollar to the weary slumberers, (they had surely never been in America!) they turned away with a grunt.

“Then, O happy thought, I recollected the brandy; and bringing my keg to the bedside, I tapped it, and offered them a glass if they would get up. This was quite another thing; they vawned, stretched their limbs, and stood upon the floor. Poor fellows I we then saw how ill and fagged they looked, though they were splendid specimens of the human race.

“Pouring a glass of the fiery compound down their throats, they put on their coats, and followed us like sleepy dogs; but in a few moments were rowing us like heroes.”

All travellers agree in bearing witness to the passion of the Lapps for alcoholic liquors. If we could spare our apostles of temperance and advocates of Good Templarism, which, alas ! we cannot afford to do, few better fields could be found for their admirable labours than Lapland.

Captain Hutchinson, however, has more pleasant experiences to relate, and more agreeable “interiors” to sketch, than the preceding. Let us accompany him, for instance, on a visit to the island of Bjorkholm.

RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LAPPS. 205

The settlement here is very small, consisting of only two or three houses, and a few barns and sheds. The inhabitants, after the usual manner of the Lapps, support themselves by fishing in summer, and by the reindeer in winter. Not a tree or shrub grows upon the island; only grass.

The hostess, on this occasion, was an active, good-natured little woman, not more than four feet high, who flew to and fro with a really wonderful agility. At one moment she was mounted on the dresser, searching for forks and spoons; at another, almost buried in a deep box, diving for sheets and table-cloth. Crockery was decidedly scarce; and a china slop-basin, with a wreath of prettily painted little flowers round the margin, had really a hard time of it.

It was first presented to Captain Hutchinson and his party for the purpose of washing their hands; at supper it appeared filled with chocolate; in the morning it reappeared as their joint washing-basin.

However, the’ little Lapp entertained them right royally, with hot kippered salmon, pancakes, dried reindeer, and eggs.

The beds were very comfortable, the mattresses of hay, with the whitest of sheets. And though the hostess and her family seemed very poor, relics of former grandeur were visible in the silver spoons, teapot, goblet, and cream-jug.

A recent writer observes that the inferiority of the Lapp race is as conspicuous from the intellectual as from the physical point of view. This is evident from the most cursory glance at their lives and manners. The Lapp is, on the whole, a simple, timid, regular, honest creature. To his great defect we have already adverted,—that excessive partiality for strong liquors, which would be sufficient to bring about the annihilation of his race within a more or less limited period, even if his days were not numbered from every other concurrent cause. He is essentially nomadic. He is perfectly free and independent throughout the solitary wastes which extend from the North Cape to the sixty-fourth degree of latitude; he plants his tent where he pleases, generally close to a wood or lake; and he moves on when the moss all around it has been eaten up. Such a mode of life is, of course, incompatible with the progress of Swedish, Norwegian, and even Finlandish civilization, which, year by year, curtails the territory given up to the migration of the nomadic Lapps.

There is about the life of the Lapps, in summer, says Count D’Almeida, a certain charm of independence, which might prove seductive to certain minds, weary of civilization and unwitting of mosquitoes. But in winter, no being of any other race could with impunity endure such privations and sufferings as they undergo. They are compelled to keep a careful watch upon their herds, which are in constant danger from the snow-storms and the wolves. In the hard frosts, when the snow is upwards of three feet in depth, they arc compelled to dig it up with their axes, so as to obtain access for their reindeer to the moss, which constitutes their only food in winter. Their vigorous constitutions and their power of enduring privation and climatic rigour, explain how it was that man, in the Glacial Age, though without any of the appliances of civilization, could endure its tremendous severity. What the Lapps can bear in point of toil and want is almost incredible. They suffer, and are strong, in a sense the poet never contemplated. It frequently happens that they are surprised by a snow-hurricane; they sleep on the ground, covered with snow-flakes, which, on awaking, they simply shake off, and pursue their

206 THE LAPPS AND QUENES.

way. In an excess of cold which would chill our blood, even if we were running at the top of our speed, they will fall, in a lit of intoxication, on the ground, and lie there with impunity for hours. It is said that in mid-winter, women, suddenly seized with the pains of childbirth while on the road, are delivered in the snow, without any ill result, either to them or their offspring.

But, as the same writer remarks, human strength cannot exceed certain limits. The Lapp ages early in life, and dies young. When he attains an advanced age, his fate is still more lamentable. It is said that if an old man falls sick while a tribe is accomplishing one of its customary migrations, his children frequently abandon him,—leaving him with some provisions at the foot of a tree, or on the bank of a stream, with the terrible prospect before him of dying of starvation, or falling a prey to wild beasts. The Lapp is always poor even when he may be called rich; for it is calculated that to maintain a family of four persons, a herd of fully four hundred reindeer is necessary, representing a capital of about £16O.

The Lapp dialect is described as resembling the Finnish. When we remember that the Lapps and the Quenes, or Finns, wear a similar costume, are distinguished by very similar customs, and that the two people call themselves by the same generic name, Suomi, we can understand why some travellers persist in regarding them as sprung from the same common stock. But a careful investigation shows the absolute distinctness of the Lapps from the Finns, notwithstanding this similarity of name and language—a similarity due, as in many other countries, to the influences of conquest or colonization. Some ethnologists, and among them M. D’Omalins, include the Finns among the white, or Caucasian race, and leave the Lapps among the inferior branches of the great Mongol family. It seems certain that a greater difference exists between the Que”nes and the Lapps of Northern Norway than between the Quenes and tjie Scandinavians of the same region.

The Que”nes have adapted themselves completely to sedentary and agricultural habits, while the Lapps, as yet, have not made a single advance in the direction of raising themselves above a pastoral and nomadic life. On the other hand, Finns constantly intermarry with the Swedes or Norwegians; while unions between Lapps and Scandinavians, or even between Lapps and Finns, are regarded throughout the entire country as monstrous anomalies. Lastly: laying aside the arguments founded upon the physical conformation of the Lapps and the Finns, an important historical consideration seems to prove their distinct co-existence from a period far anterior to the settlement of the Suiones and the Goths in the peninsula; it is that in the Finnish mythology we constantly meet with legends of battles between dwarfs and giants. It is impossible that these can refer to the warfare between the Finns and the Scandinavians, for the latter were of the same stature as the former; and it is in comparison with the Lapps only that the Finns could relatively be called r/iants.

We borrow from Count D’Alviella a few particulars relating to the stationary Lapps, who inhabit the region of West Bothnia, or Wcsterbotten, a long, narrow strip of land dividing the Gulf of Bothnia from Lapland proper. These Lapps seem to be the product of a mixture of races in which the Scandinavian element predominates. They are of an ordinary stature, robust, with regular features, light hair, and clear gray eyes.

The country in which they dwell has a strange, an original, but a monotonous character.

THE .STATIONARY LA1TS. 207

It is its monotony which wearies the traveller, though at first he will be impressed by its fresh yet severe beauty. The forests of birch and fir seem endless, and the great lakes in their depths fatigue the eye with their wastes of cold, drear water. Occasionally, however, the traveller comes upon a smiling plain, enamelled with myosotis, and brightened by a silver-shining, music-murmuring stream. Here and there the wood is thinner, and lean cows may be seen feeding among the half-stripped stems. Next comes a clearing, where the forest has been swept away by fire; a clearing with fields of rye and barley; a palisade enclosure, and a group of chalets, with a comparatively spacious and undilapidated building in the centre.

These gdrds, as they are called, closely resemble each other throughout the North. Neither material nor space is begrudged to the West Bothnian architects. Even the smallest farm comprises three or four buildings, which generally form a square on the four sides of an inner court. These buildings—how unlike the wretched, filthy hut of the nomadic Lapp!—comprise three living-rooms, kitchen, and stables; and are divided from each other only by a partition of horizontally-laid planks, the interstices being filled up by moss. The furniture is simple, convenient, suitable, and shining with cleanliness, like a Dutch kitchen. Around the hearth is hung a series of brightly-coloured prints, representing cither a Scriptural scene or events in the life of an illustrious personage,—King Charles XV., or the bishop of the diocese, side by side with the universal legendary figures, Napoleon I. and Garibaldi. Close by stands the old hereditary locker, in which the husband accumulates his money and the wife deposits her trinkets; to the wall is suspended a complete trophy of knives, pipes, belts with silver buckles, sledge-bells, and a whip with a carved horn handle. The whole scene is one of order and the proprieties of family life.

All these dwellings, it may be added, do not wear the same aspect of prosperous neatness; but even-where poverty is present, it is unaccompanied by that sullen gloom and melancholy squalidness which, in other countries, is the painful indication and result of long-endured privation. And here, we must also remember, poverty and famine are not always inseparable companions. The shadow of hunger frequently darkens the rich man’s door, and a man might perish for want of food on a sack of gold. One winter, the wealthiest members of the community were reduced to the necessity of eating bread made of bark mixed with moss.

Still, we see how wide a difference separates the stationary from the nomadic Lapp, and how impossible it is for a wandering population to acquire or appreciate the comforts of civilized life. A pastoral race, in the present age of the world, is, and must be, a decaying, because a barbarous race. If it touches the borders of civilization, it is only to become infected with its vices, and thus to hasten its inevitable decav.

Differences between Sweden and Denmark

I think that’s more of a question of geography especially for newcomers and those curious about them at first. While both of them are peninsulas, Sweden’s much bigger sharing a border with both Norway to the left and Finland to the right but only with the latter being a former Swedish colony/partner (Denmark practically colonised Norway, Faroes and Greenland). Sweden’s also got a larger population but since Denmark’s much smaller, it’s more densely populated.

Denmark’s both geographically and to some extent, historically and culturally closer to the rest of Europe, especially Germany and the Netherlands which with the former, Schleswig-Holstein’s formerly part of Denmark. Not to mention the latter two have Frisians as one of their long-standing ethnic minorities. In Sweden, Norway and Finland Samis take their place.

On a more trivial note, Denmark begat Lego and Sweden begat Ikea. (The closest Finnish equivalent would be the Moomin series.)