When it comes to the subject of fur farming in a Russianised Canada, I feel it would take time for it to be socially acceptable again, but mostly due to Canada being this close to America that despite having the potential to be more similar to Russia, it didn’t turn out that way for long because of America exerting a bigger influence on it just by sharing borders together. Canada even has many of the same geographical conditions that make it just as amenable to fur farming as Russia is and it actually was for years, though one would wonder if it takes time for fur farming to be socially acceptable again there, who’s going to be willing to work in such an industry this time? That’s not to say there aren’t any Native American vegans out there, they certainly do exist just as there are those who have made clothing out of plant fibres for years.
But the difference has to do with geography where in the case with precolonial Mexico, though there certainly were people who wore fur clothing in any way that it can be considered as such, but the average Aztec/Nahuatl citizen were wont to wear clothes out of maguey instead. Maguey being one of those plants used to make clothing there, though those living close to the Arctic (i.e. Inuit, Cree, Ojibwe) were likelier to wear animal skins instead due to the colder climate. Not to mention that even if indigenous people do care about animals and have the same pets as white people do (even cats, I know those who own them online), it seems to be more of a European descendant thing to get really sentimental over animals (from the indigenous North American standpoint). Given it’s not uncommon for indigenous North Americans to work with animal skins in any way, they’ll gravitate to fur farming more.
Especially if they’re this desperate for any income/salary to support themselves and their families as well as keeping their cultural practises alive after being marginalised and ostracised by white settlers for long, so their attitude towards both hunting and animal husbandry would take on a peculiar character. I remember reading an article saying that when it comes to the indigenous North American attitude to hunting, it’s depicted as reciprocal where the hunted animal consents to being hunted by people. It’s not obvious at first but it does defy both popular western strains of thought regarding hunting where on one hand, you have the strong hunting is cruel mentality. And on the other hand, you have people having a dominion mentality where animals exist for their convenience. Not so much where the hunted animal exists in a reciprocal relationship with humanity.
I suspect a number of Native Americans already do work in fur farming themselves, both to preserve their cultures and it’s kind of socially unacceptable for white people to do this, but it does make wonder if white people do this as they really don’t see nonwhite people as human in any way. Not necessarily dehumanised in the conventional sense, but sometimes treated as afterthoughts compared to animals (where they’re much more into). Like even if some white people do care about nonwhite people, but when they care a lot more about or obsess over animals than they do with nonwestern and nonwhite cultures, you get the impression that the latter are easily afterthoughts to them. A kind of lukewarm racism where it’s not outright contempt or fetishisation, but that nonwhite peoples and cultures are afterthoughts and deemed less interesting than say animals.
Practically nobodies because I think it’s easier for white people to project humanity onto animals, making them more than what they actually are, than to show interest in nonwhite and nonwestern cultures with the possibility that the latter could undermine or upend their understanding of things. Maybe not necessarily as there are people who do care for dogs and make their dogs hunt rodents in China, the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam just like their counterparts in the west. Or people caring for cats and making them hunt the same in Cameroon, Ghana, Cote D’Ivoire and Kenya, but I feel you’re more likely to find a white person who’s a lot more into animals than being into both animals and nonwestern cultures. Not helped by that many of them don’t actively seek out non-western language websites, let alone for a sustained period of time and for this often.
Although it’s possible not all African Americans condone wearing fur clothing, eating meat and the like, as a good number of them are vegans really, but for others wearing fur is a sign that they’ve made it. Especially given how and why there are socioeconomic barriers that keep most African Americans from living the same lifestyles and having the same salaries as their white counterparts do, that fur clothing is a sign of opulence among them. The fact that it’s socially unacceptable for white people to not only partake in fur farming themselves, but also wear fur garments just the same that these interrelated practises have gotten more racialised these days. That doesn’t mean Native Americans and African Americans alike can’t be vegans, but it’s a kind of white flight where once something’s deemed socially unacceptable that white people flee away from it.
So in the case with Canada joining Russia as one of its many protectorates and the only surviving North American property once America disappears, if you believe Celestial (who’s one of some who say that America is Mystery Babylon, the nation-state said to corrupt the world in the Bible), then it would be a particularly awkward situation that once Mystery Babylon/America disappears as prophesised that a good chunk of the North American landmass has disappeared. Leaving behind the Caribbean, Canada, Mexico and Central America as the survivors, and if America is Mystery Babylon then it shouldn’t be surprising that even if it didn’t originate some of these ideologies, it would play a lending hand in popularising them a lot more than their originators ever did. Perhaps one would wonder why America even has a number of places called Babylon to begin with.
Whilst Cush/Ethiopia and Egypt are both west of Babylon/Iraq, but since neither of them became global superpowers and so did the Ashanti Empire/Ghana and Senegal (also west of West Asia), this leaves the Americas as the likeliest place to find Mystery Babylon in. But then again neither Canada nor Mexico became global superpowers and so do all the Caribbean and Central American countries, Brazil has come close but never quite near the scope America enjoys, so America is the likeliest candidate for Mystery Babylon then. Whatever ideology that got popularised by America is at odds with many Christians, including the more politically right wing among them in the Americas, that it truly is deserving of the moniker of Mystery Babylon. So it will disappear for good, never to be seen again.
At any point where Canada becomes the only North American property of Russia once America disappears and one of two Russian satellites/protectorates/colonies in the Americas before America disappears, given it would take time for white Canadians to warm up to fur farming and the like that it’s practically up to Native Americans to take up the challenge that nobody else wants. I even said that Native Americans might be among those people willing to partake in fur farming themselves, since it’s deemed socially unacceptable by white people, that if no other demographic wants that job then Native Americans will gravitate to it. Maybe not all Native Americans just as not all white North Americans are averse to fur farming themselves, but I feel the former are far likelier to gravitate to it. Fur farming is so stigmatised that it’ll be mostly stigmatised people that’ll gravitate to it.
Especially Native North Americans but given their own communities and cultural practises involve a good deal of using and cultivating animal skins for centuries, that fur farming will be a walk in the park for them. One might speculate about a future that at any point when Canada consents to joining Russia is when Native Americans will eagerly breed Arctic foxes, red foxes, wolves, muskrats, American mink, chinchillas and even ferrets for fur, it’s like that in Russia where some Russian farmers do breed and use ferrets for fur like they do with their relatives like wolverines and American mink. There are indigenous North American communities that have experience with the latter two, so it would be business as usual if they started breeding wolverines and American mink for fur in earnest, well in a way. Even then, if Canada does join Russia at all, that this will lead to profound exchanges that concern the Arctic.
It is speculative for now but highly plausible given how and why Native Americans seem less squeamish towards using animal skins for clothing than white people do, not that it makes them any more desclined towards veganism or animal welfare, but it’s got to do with a kind of white flight where once fur farming’s deemed socially unacceptable for white people to partake that many, if not most, Native Americans would be one of those peoples who’ll be put up with its nature at all. One of those peoples who’ll even partake in fur farming in any way that kind of deters white people from it, though it would be really controversial in Canada if they ever use ferrets for fur farming. Given there are others who keep them as pets and even use them for hunting, and it’s more common than with mink, so using them for fur farming will be precluded altogether.
Whilst there are people who do keep American mink, chinchillas, rabbits and red foxes as pets in Canada, fewer still have Arctic foxes as pets and given how long Canada has been Americanised, despite its potential to become even more like Russia, it would be pretty awkward for Canada to warm up to fur farming again and be amenable to even breeding red foxes for their pelts in years. So I feel Native Americans would inevitably and plausibly gravitate to this more, as it’s socially unacceptable for white people to partake in it in any way, speaking from my experience it’s Native Americans (irrespective of gender) who’re less squeamish towards skinning animals for clothing. Let’s not forget that unemployment among them can be pretty high, not helped by that they’re often precluded from the things they love working on.
Thus giving them nothing better to do in life, speaking as somebody who’s endured unemployment for long, having something better to do and getting paid for it is a better and kinder option. Especially when this person wants to wean themselves from doing something wrong (I’m speaking from my own experiences here), that it would be wiser to immediately support them than to leave them to their own devices but with no real direction in sight. That wouldn’t excuse others from animal abuse but when it comes to those who do want (to have) something better to do in life, that perhaps consistent employment and salaries are preferable to having nothing better to do in life at all. Though I feel this is something many animal rights activists miss out on, since they don’t really know what’s like to be both deprived of your culture and be unemployed for long, as to seek out less productive means in life.
Especially if you’re Native American that it becomes a damned if you do, damned if you don’t whenever these guys are around, torn between wanting to preserve one’s culture through one’s occupation of choice and having to assimilate into settler society by doing whatever they’re made to do against their will. It might not be unique to them but it’s a vexing situation to end up in where you feel the need to find a way to hold onto your culture as much as you can, but you’re eventually deprived of it again and again because people think you’re evil or something. Either that or some animal rights activists don’t see the world in greyscale, though I’m sometimes like this in a way as well (hard for me to admit). Though at times they don’t understand what’s like to be unemployed and not supported by others when you want to work on something.
This is something that I’ve experienced when it came to soapmaking because I wanted to have something better to do because I was addicted to something bad, though my grandmother didn’t allow me to even when it could’ve given me some income early on. There are likely some ARAs and vegans who do get this but I’m afraid it’s easier to be hung up on an ideology that promotes a strong black and white mindset that makes it harder to understand why other people do these things, especially if they really want a consistent income and something better to do in life. Depriving them of these things gives them little else to do in life, nothing more productive to do to get them by. Quite inevitably if fur farming ever becomes fashionable in Canada again, it would take time for Canadians to adjust to this new reality after being socialised to find it unacceptable.
And of all the Canadian nationals who’ll end up partaking it anyways would be indigenous people, who by then partake in small scale fur farming. Fur farming in a Russianised Canada wouldn’t be as big as it was before, but certainly more present than it ever was in the recent past. It would be more of a cottage industry where a select handful of people, but most notably indigenous Canadians at that, who’d willingly raise foxes, mink, wolverines and the like for fur both to preserve their cultures and to have any consistent income in any way they need and like. Their most likely clients are Russians who live in a world where Canada and all of Europe are Russian protectorates, so they learn to go with Russia’s orders every now and then. In the case with the Inuit people, it’s like this with seals for quite a while. Earning money from fur farming would be the near-default for a number of indigenous Canadians by then.
Since it would take time for Canada to warm up to fur farming again in years that it would take Native Americans to willingly make a living from a rather stigmatised agricultural discipline, that when fur farming does become socially acceptable again in Canada it would be a glorified cottage industry for many Native Americans working for their Russian clients, whilst seeking that happy middle ground when it comes to preserving their own folkways for long. It might have already been something of a cottage industry for them before, assuming if they worked in fur farming beforehand, but the resurgence of fur farming in Canada due to a Russian influence would have a lot of Native Americans willingly gravitating to it, because their white counterparts remain socialised to reject it.
It could change though I still think Native Americans would be one of the only peoples to partake in fur farming, if it does become fashionable again in the future when Canada does join Russia at all.