Some differences

I think I’ve noticed this before, but I get the impression that there’s more awareness of dogs as an invasive species in Brazil, Argentina and Chile than in America. Either that these three have more stray dogs than America does or even if these three have a lot of dog owners and dog lovers, there’s more awareness of the damage they inflict on the environment than America does. Maybe not always the case, but speaking from personal experience even if there are studies on dog predation in America not a lot of Americans see dogs as an invasive species the way they do with cats.

There might be an anti-cat sentiment in Brazil, Chile and Argentina since not a lot of them own cats, but even then despite having a high dog ownership rate a good number of them are aware of the damage dogs inflict on the environment enough to make considerable amount of studies on that. It’s possible that Chile, Brazil and Argentina still have a lot of stray dogs and free-roaming dogs in general, so they’re more aware of their faults than America does. So aware they even see them as an invasive species, despite having even more dog owners than America does.

Okay, I might be speaking from experience where it seems there are more Americans and Australians who mostly or solely cats as an invasive species but don’t say much about dogs whereas relatively more Brazilians, Chileans and Argentinians see dogs as an invasive species as well. I might be biased in here, but either that Brazil, Chile and Argentina have more stray dogs wrecking havoc or that despite having a higher dog ownership rate than Australia and America do more Australians and Americans disproportionately blame cats.

It could be a bit of both, but I have a nagging feeling that even if there’s ever an anti-cat sentiment in Brazil and the Southern Cone in general there are more Brazilian, Chilean and Argentinian studies regarding dogs as an invasive species than America and Australia do. Again, it’s due to my experience going to Lusophone and Hispanophone websites where by going there I get idea of what’s actually going on there that gets missed out in Anglophone websites. True, dog predation on wildlife has been understudied but I actually think dogs might present the best example of the social-ecological mismatch.

While they are a valued asset in conservation, they can also pose threats to it and this is why they are the best example of the social-ecological mismatch. We’re used to seeing them as valuable pets and companions that we can’t see them as anything other than those roles, even though they’re perfectly capable of killing wildlife on their own. One of my former dogs had a habit of killing frogs that my father had to install fences to minimise this. Another dog ate a skink.

I think it is important to take what goes on in nonwestern and global South countries, if because a lot of insight that those in North America and Europe miss out. Well to an extent, but it’s still important to take note of these.

The problem with American mink

The American mink, also known as vison and visone in French and Italian, is a mammal that hunts animals and has been raised for its fur since the 19th century (and possibly earlier). The problem with American mink came when they got introduced to Europe as well as Chile and Argentina for their fur, where you have some people deliberately releasing them to be free range and others release them to free them from the fur trade. While the latter’s well-meant, it didn’t bode well for native wildlife where for water voles in Britain their numbers have dwindled by 94 %. For those who don’t know, the water vole’s a semiaquatic rodent that’s sometimes known as a water rat (and called as such in Catalan) and that’s the animal that Ratty (from the novel Wind in the Willows) is supposed to be.

The author of the book, Kenneth Grahame, dodged a bullet as American mink weren’t yet introduced to Britain when he was writing the novel and while he depicted native (European) mustelids like ferrets and stoats as villains, if he wrote the story this time he would’ve included the American mink as one of the villains. If I’m not mistaken, there are attempts at introducing the European mink (a different mustelid, albeit one native to continental Europe) and in the case with one Estonian island in order to reintroduce the European mink they had to exterminate the American mink first. While this isn’t exactly a humane method, it’s needed to keep them from interfering with their European counterparts.

While American mink do have their fans and owners such as Joseph ‘Minkman’ Carter who uses them for hunting rats in America, the fact that they’re not native to Europe and South America is cemented by that they prey on vulnerable species such as the water vole in Britain. Some American mink are small enough to take advantage of water vole homes is alarming enough that they even set up traps to keep American mink from attacking water voles. While American mink are fine in their native habitat, the fact that they’re transported to Europe for fur can pose problems though not always what you think it is in that they hunt native wildlife and nearly drove British water voles to extinction.

American mink do share similarities with raccoon dogs in that both of them are exported to Europe to be raised for their fur and are invasive to that part of Eurasia, I actually think they’re better off not being transported to Europe at all so that they won’t prey on native wildlife there. The presence of American mink in Europe and South America is an ecological disaster as they’ve been noted to nearly drive two species to extinction (the water vole in Britain and the hooded grebe in Argentina) is a side-effect of being introduced for their fur, only for some to escape whether at will or deliberately introduced by humans.

If it’s the latter, then despite all the good intentions American mink preyed on native wildlife and sometimes for the worse in the case with water voles in Britain.

What I do know about Latin America

If there are any differences between Latin American countries, they’re bound to happen to varying degrees given not only the differences in vocabulary but also geography, history and ethnic composition. From what I know about Mexicans, a good number of them are Native American but a substantial number of them are mestizo in the sense of being half European, half Native American which shows in their culture being influenced by both Aztec/Nahuatl culture and Iberian/Spanish culture. I could say similar things about Peruvian culture being influenced by both the Incas and Spanish or Guatemala with regards to the Mayans and Spanish. (Then again Mayan and Inca languages probably belong to different language families so it should go the same for Nahuatl.)

When we head to other Latin American countries such as Chile, Argentina and Brazil Native Americans become a minority. From what I know about Brazil, many of their indigenous Brazilians are threatened by disease, loss of their language and culture and loss of their members. That’s pretty unfortunate considering their cultures are potentially interesting and worth preserving, if only more people cared about them. That’s probably the same for the Mapudungun people in Chile, where their language has been endangered and there are probably attempts at preserving the language for decades to come if only more people learnt the language. So it seems in the Southern Cone (whether if it includes Brazil in it), there’s a risk of indigenous cultures being endangered.

So in Chile, we have the Mapudungun people and in Brazil those that live in the Amazon rainforest, some of them are uncontacted tribes which would represent a wealth of curiosity with regards to their culture. Not to mention Brazil’s Portuguese speaking, it’s a language similar to Spanish but distinct in its own right. As for sports and the like, Mexico has masked wrestling but Argentina tends to be more gaucho or based around its own version of cowboys and herders. Guatemala doesn’t have a tradition of masked wrestling either, so it’s something that’s uniquely Mexican as far as I know about it. While all Latin American countries have football as their most commonly practised sport, only Mexico has masked wrestling both as a sport and as entertainment.

When it comes to comics, here’s what I know about some countries. Mexico has Kaliman, which’s based on a radio play. Brazil has Turma da Monica, which’s a popular children’s magazine that has led to a lot of merchandise such as baby diapers, Chile has Condorito and Argentina has Mafalda. Another difference would be that Chile’s just a narrow strip of land whereas Argentina and Brazil tend to be wider but both Mexico and Guatemala face Atlantic and Pacific oceans. There are jungles in Guatemala, Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela but not in Argentina and Chile. Argentina and Chile face the Antarctic, which should make them the coldest southernmost countries in the world. (Not to mention the Southern Lights are a thing in those two, especially in Tierra del Fuego which seems to be on fire.)

Mexico’s still in the Northern Hemisphere, only marginally North of the equator whereas Brazil goes south of the equator (the north’s in the equator so it’s hotter than the south). That’s what I know about Latin America.

On Latin America

Romance-speaking countries in the Americas though I think Haiti and part of Canada should be included as they speak French, a Romance language but I don’t think they’re usually thought of as Latin American as this goes to Hispanophone countries instead. Of course there are bound to be differences between countries going all the way to include variations in vocabulary and accents as well as customs and geography.

Admittedly, what I do know about Chile and Argentina’s that they’re not tropical (they’re south of the tropics and close to the Antarctic as to be rather cold) and they reach the Antarctic. So they’d be much colder or cooler than most of Latin America whereas Central America’s mostly situated in the Tropics so they’d be warmer. (Makes sense that Northern Brazil’s warmer than Southern Brazil as it’s also situated in the tropics.)

To me, the biggest real difference between Chile and Argentina’s that Chile faces the Pacific Ocean and Argentina faces the Atlantic Ocean given I don’t know much about Chile and Argentina. Plus Chile consists of a narrower strip of land than Argentina does. (Though in all honesty, I’d consider them to be contenders for the South American equivalent to Canada in terms to being close to polar regions.)

As for Mexico, that’s the Latin American country I know better and that’s the country where it had a vast Aztec civilisation where farmers build artificial islands called chinampas and where the Chihuahua and the Xolotl come from. It’s also home to El Chavo del Ocho, which’s a popular Mexican comedy programme and Kaliman (Chile can claim Condorito and Argentina can claim Mafalda).

Mexico’s home to the Aztecs so logically Guatemala’s home to the Mayans and Peru can claim the Incas. Likewise Brazil has probably the largest black population in all of the Americas and especially in South America, though the United States can be a rival in here. There’s a tendency for Americans to treat Latin America as interchangeable, even if that ignores the nuances.

For instance, the Peruvian Incas domesticated the guinea pig and the llama whereas Argentina can claim the Dogo Argentino and Mexicans have their chihuahuas and xolotls. Argentina has a prominent gaucho culture shared with Paraguay and Uruguay, whereas Chile doesn’t have much of an equivalent to it and Northern Mexico has a cowboy tradition. Then again, Guatemala, Peru and a few other Latin American countries don’t have much of a cowboy culture.

Insular Cuba and Puerto Rico don’t have a tradition of these, but that’s due to my rather limited knowledge of Latin America that I need to brush up upon.

Differences in South America

It’s probably easier to tease Brazil apart from most of South America in that it’s got a large black population and also a lot of Portuguese speakers due to being part of Portugal before but to tell the difference from each South American Hispanophone country, it’s a matter of history and geography as well as demographics.

Chile’s practically a narrow strip of land, whereas Argentina’s wider and even reaches the Antarctic (parts of Argentina deserve to be considered some of the coldest southermost parts of the Earth). Bolivia and Peru have substantial Native American communities, especially Incan Quechas whereas Mapuches are in Chile and Argentina.

If you want me to be more pedantic, there are comics that arguably have telltale origins so Condorito’s from Chile, Mafalda’s from Argentina and Monica’s from Brazil. (Logically, Peanuts is from America just as For Better or Worse’s from Canada and Memin’s Mexican*.)

Not to mention both Paraguay and Bolivia are landlocked, but Peru, Chile, Argentina and Venezuela have beaches so.

*Aya de Yopougon’s from Cote d’Ivoire, Supa Strikas is from South Africa and Shujaaz’s from Kenya.

AT HOME WITH THE PATAGONIANS

The precipice – Page 29
https://books.google.com.ph › books

Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov, ‎Laury Magnus, ‎Boris Jakim – 1994 – ‎Snippet view – ‎More editions
They themselves had once shined in the great world of society, but they had become spinsters— for reasons long forgotten by everyone but themselves. … Sophie’s marriage had almost disrupted their life, but then she was widowed and lost her mother. … She always had several handkerchiefs nearby, and was forever accompanied by a lapdog— old, always sleepy, wheezing, and because of its extreme …
The Battle with the Slum

AT HOME
WITH
THE PATAGONIANS

THE “PRETTY HOUSE” AND DANCE.

The chief amusements amongst the Indians (for hunting is a matter of business and not pleasure) consist in horse-racing, card-playing, gambling with dice made by themselves with mathematical exactness from bones, and thrown from the hand, or with small stones, and playing a game of ball. The horse-racing has been already described. The cards used are sometimes the Spanish pack, obtained in the- 175 – settlements, but very frequently constructed by the Indians themselves of hide. These, like the ordinary Spanish cards, are marked with the Spanish numerals up to seven; but the court cards are entirely different, having, instead of figures or pictures, monograms of native origin, the original significance of which, if any, was undiscoverable. The ace, however, is marked somewhat similarly to our own. The usual games played are ‘Panturga,’ ‘Primero,’ ‘Siete,’ and ‘Yaik,’ or fire, a sort of ‘beggar my neighbour.’ The players sit down in a circle, with a poncho or saddle-cloth to represent the board of green cloth; their markers consist of pieces of sticks or grass, and their system of marking is complicated. I generally—if I did indulge in the luxury of a gamble—played in partnership with another who took charge of the marking, but my invariable good luck rendered me unwilling to respond to the invitation to take a hand. When stakes are lost, whether a horse, troop of mares, saddle, lazo, or what not, the winner simply sends a friend for them, or goes himself and takes them; all debts of honour being scrupulously paid at once. Frequently large stakes are lost and won. On one occasion I had negotiated the purchase of a horse from an Indian possessed of a goodly troop, and having given earnest, had started hunting on the animal to test his staying powers. My friend the owner, who remained in camp playing, came to me on my return, and implored me to consider the bargain as nil, as during my absence he had lost nearly all his horses, and some of the articles of his wife’s dowry. I of course gave up the bargain, duly receiving back the earnest, and he subsequently won back his horses and riches. The game played with small stones is similar to that in vogue among schoolboys, and known by the name of ‘knucklebones.’ It is generally played by the boys, but their elders will not unfrequently join. The women play at cards, and also at this game amongst themselves, staking their mandils, hides, and saddle-gear on the results. Mrs. Orkeke was very fond of play, and on one occasion I have reason to believe that she lost some of her husband’s tobacco, and laid the blame on one of- 176 – the Chilians, who she averred had stolen it. The man nearly lost his life in consequence, and his tears and abject supplications showed the terror he was in, but happily he on this occasion escaped. Strange to say, I was in no way suspected, although I knew where the tobacco was kept, which I doubt if the deserter did.

The game of ball is confined to the young men, and is played as follows: A lazo is laid on the ground so as to form a ring about four yards in diameter; the players, generally eight in number, step into the circle naked, with the exception of the waistcloth. A ball composed of hide stuffed with feathers, about the size of or larger than a tennis-ball, is used by each party, who throw it up from under the thigh, and strike it with the hand at the adversaries’, each hit counting a point. Great dexterity and activity are shown by the young men, and although I never joined in any of their regular matches I frequently watched the parties occupied in the game, in which their splendid muscular development was brought out conspicuously. Besides these amusements, the Indians, when ammunition is plentiful, occasionally fire at a mark; but as their bullets are frequently hammered round with stones, the practice is at times erratic, and the guns are also sometimes more dangerous to the marksman than the mark.

The daily routine of occupations and amusements is varied sometimes by a fight, and more pleasantly by some one or other of the ceremonials which mark—as in all nations—the principal epochs of Tsoneca life, from the cradle to the grave. On the birth of a child, if the parents are rich, i.e. own plenty of mares and horses, and silver ornaments, notice is immediately given to the doctor or wizard of the tribe, and to the cacique and relations. The doctor, after bleeding himself with bodkins in the temple, fore-arm, or leg, gives the order for the erection of a mandil tent, or pretty house as the Indians call it, and mares are slaughtered, and a feast and dance follow, such as described in Chapter III., p. 76 as having taken place in the valley of the Rio Chico. The child, shortly after birth, is smeared over with damp gypsum.- 177 – The mothers are able to travel on horseback the same, or, certainly, the subsequent day, with the infant carried in a wicker cradle, and most tenderly cared for by both parents.

To every child in its infancy horses and gear are allotted, which are considered thenceforth as the personal property of the boy or girl, and cannot be resumed or disposed of by the parents. No ceremonial attends the naming a child, nor, as far as I could see, is there any fixed time for doing so. The names most commonly used are taken, I think, from places—from the place of birth. Patronymics or hereditary names—except in rare instances, which appeared to be imitations of Spanish usage—are unknown, but nicknames are universal, and parents are frequently known by the name of a child, which usurps the place of their own.

The boys soon learn the use of the weapons, and both boys and girls ride almost before they can walk: the sons rarely accompany the father to the chase before ten or twelve years of age, and do not join in fights till they are about sixteen years old, but there is no fixed period and no ceremonial to mark their admission to the state of manhood. The attainment of puberty by the girls is celebrated as described in p. 76. From the age of nine or ten they are accustomed to help in household duties and manufactures, and about sixteen are eligible for the married life, though they often remain for several years spinsters. Marriages are always those of inclination, and if the damsel does not like the suitor for her hand, her parents never force her to comply with their wishes, although the match may be an advantageous one.

The usual custom is for the bridegroom, after he has secured the consent of his damsel, to send either a brother or an intimate friend to the parents, offering so many mares, horses, or silver ornaments for the bride. If the parents consider the match desirable, as soon after as circumstances will permit, the bridegroom, dressed in his best, and mounted on his best horse, decorated with silver ornaments—if he possesses any—proceeds to the toldo of his intended, and hands over the gifts. The parents of the bride then return gifts of an equal value, which, however, in the event of a- 178 – separation (a rare event), become the property of the bride. After this the bride is escorted by the bridegroom to his toldo, amidst the cheers of his friends and the singing of the women. Mares are usually then slaughtered and eaten on the spot; great care being taken that the dogs do not touch any of the meat or offal, as it is considered unlucky. The head, backbone, tail, together with the heart and liver, are taken up to the top of a neighbouring hill, as an offering to the Gualichu, or evil spirit. An Indian is allowed to have as many wives as he can support, but it is rare to find a man with more than two, and they generally only have one.

On the death of a Tehuelche all his horses, dogs, and other animals are killed, his ponchos, ornaments, bolas, and all other personal belongings are placed in a heap and burned, the widow and other womankind keeping up a dismal wailing, and crying out loud in the most melancholy manner. The meat of the horses is distributed amongst the relations on both sides; and the widow, who cuts her hair short in front and assumes black paint, repairs, bag and baggage, to the toldo of her relations, or if she has none in the party, to the toldo of the chief.

The body is sewn up in a mantle, poncho, or coat of mail, if the deceased possessed one, and is taken away by some of the relations and buried in a sitting posture, its face to the east, a cairn of stones being erected over the place, varying in size according to the wealth and influence of the deceased. I have never seen any of the graves described in Mr. Wood’s work, but as my travels as a rule were confined to the interior, they may exist in some part of the sea-coast; nor did the exhumation and removal of the body ever come under my notice, and I should be inclined to doubt its being ever practised by the Tehuelches, inasmuch as it is a rule amongst them never to mention the name of, and to avoid all allusion to, the deceased, their idea being that the dead should be utterly forgotten, though they will add a stone in passing to the cairn of a distinguished chief or hero. The death of a child is marked by a display of sincere grief on the part of- 179 – the parents. The horse it has been accustomed to travel on during the march is brought up, the gear placed on it, even to the cradle, and the horse, thus fully caparisoned, is strangled by means of lazos, whereas in all other ceremonies where horses are killed they are knocked on the head with bolas. The saddle gear, cradle, and all belonging to the child are burned, the women crying and singing. The parents moreover throw their own valuables into the fire to express their grief. These things some of the women who cry are allowed to snatch out, as a recompense for their services, but they seldom benefit much. On the occasion of the death of an only child of rich parents, fourteen horses and mares were slaughtered in addition to the one it had been accustomed to travel on. Towards evening of the day of the event, previous to the burial of the corpse, a select party of old women marched in procession round and round the camp, crying and wailing. Gifts were also sent to the bereaved parents by the chiefs and relations, as a well-meant effort to divert their minds from dwelling on their loss.

The religion of the Tehuelches is distinguished from that of the Pampas and Araucanians by an absence of any trace of sun-worship, although the new moon is saluted, the respectful gesture being accompanied by some low muttered words which I never could manage to hear. They believe in a great and good Spirit, who according to the tradition related by Casimiro at the place, created the Indians and animals, and dispersed them from ‘God’s-hill,’ as he explained the Indian name of the down (p. 89). I am not at all certain that this was not a confused combination of the story of the Creation, as told by the missionaries, with his own ideas. There is a great tendency in the Indian mind thus to combine the marvels told them, or even to cap what they consider one legend with another; but there is no doubt that they do believe in a good Spirit, though they think he lives ‘careless of mankind.’ They have no idols or objects of worship, nor—if a year’s experience can enable one to judge—do they observe any periodical religious festival, on which either the good or evil Spirit is adored. The mention- 180 – of this by other travellers can only be explained by confused accounts which have attributed Araucanian customs to the totally distinct Patagonians. The belief which prompts all their religious acts is that in the existence of many active and malicious evil spirits or demons, of whom the principal one is always on the watch to cause mischief. To propitiate or drive away this spirit is the function of the wizard, or doctor, or medicine man, who combines the medical and magical arts, though not possessed of an exclusive faculty for either. All sacrifices of mares and horses, not at stated times, but as occasion requires, such as a birth, death, &c., are intended to propitiate the Gualichu. When a child hurts itself, the slaughter of mares seems to partake at once of the nature of a thank-offering that the hurt was no worse, and a propitiation to avert further harm.

In camp the Gualichu takes up his position outside the back of the toldo, watching for an opportunity to molest the inmates, and is supposed to be kept quiet by the spells of the doctor, who is not only gifted with the power of laying the devil, but can even detect him by sight. I inquired of one of the doctors what he was like, but received an evasive answer; on which I informed him that my devil took all sorts of shapes—sometimes appearing as a guanaco, ostrich, puma, skunk, or vulture, at which the medical man was intensely amused. This household devil is, as far as I could ascertain, supposed to enter into the different parts of the bodies of people, and cause sickness which the doctor is appealed to to cure. The treatment in the case of headache, for instance, is very simple: the doctor takes the patient’s head between his knees, and performing a short ceremony of incantation, shouts in his ear, exhorting the devil to come out. Mr. Clarke, when travelling with the Indians south of Santa Cruz, was treated in this fashion when suffering from feverish headache, and said that at the time it relieved him.

Besides this Gualichu there are many others which are supposed to inhabit subterranean dwellings, underneath certain woods and rivers and peculiarly-shaped rocks. I was very much surprised at seeing the Indians salute these- 181 – objects by placing the hand to the head and muttering an incantation; and for a long time held to the belief that they were only expressing admiration for the Creator’s handiwork; but subsequently I learned that they sought thus to conciliate the spirits of these places, reputed to be the spirits of deceased members of the faculty. These devils’ powers, however, are confined to the districts contiguous to their habitations.

On one occasion, a horse about to run a match was taken up to a neighbouring hill before daylight by the owner, and some secret ceremony was performed by the wizard. Previous to the race the owner (Wáki) came to me and advised me to put my stakes on his horse, as he had been made safe to win by mysterious incantations which had secured the favour of the local Gualichu; and, strange to say, the horse, which by his appearance was much inferior to the other, did win, thereby establishing a reputation for the wizard and the Gualichu.

I remember on one occasion when riding with Hinchel we came in sight of a peculiarly-pointed rock, which he saluted. I did the same, at which he appeared much pleased; and on our subsequently arriving at a salina, where we found good salt, much needed at the time, he explained to me that the spirit of the place had led us in that direction. In the meeting of Indians the devils are supposed to be driven away by the horsemen chasing at full speed round and round, and firing off their guns.

With all this superstition, regard for omens, and belief in demons, they by no means accord implicit faith and respect to the wizards. Nor do they trust to their spells alone in case of disease; many possess an acquaintance with medicinal herbs, and apply them with good effect. Besides being good farriers, they practise blood-letting, not only on the sick, but, like our grandfathers, at regular seasons have themselves blooded, believing it to be beneficial. Casimiro declared that the superior health of the Tehuelches, compared with that of the colonists or Christians, was attributable to this practice. They also understand and sometimes employ poisons, not to envenom their weapons, but for secretly taking off an enemy. Such cases are rare, but in one, which came under my own observation, beyond all doubt, death was caused by poisoning the inside of a potro boot, the wearer of which had a slight wound on the leg.

Inquirers into the Tsoneca language are referred to the vocabulary in the Appendix; but it is needful to state most distinctly that it is altogether different from either Pampa or Araucanian. Though able to converse in Tehuelche, I could not at all understand the Pampas; and this is noted with reference to statements made in M. Guinnard’s work, which, coupled with other internal evidences already alluded to, compel me to doubt that the author was ever in the hands of the real Patagonians, his captors and masters being Pampas or Araucanos, whose customs are well described by him.

As distinguished from these Indians, the number of the- 184 – pure Tehuelches, both northern and southern, in Patagonia does not exceed 1,500 men, women, and children, according to the returns of effective warriors given at the time when the union of all the various parties, combined during my journey for political purposes, enabled me to compute them with exactness. Beyond the two great divisions into northern and southern, the subdivisions of tribes, so frequently given, are imaginary, or arise out of names of temporary leaders. Nor is the term clan very appropriate to the nomad parties, combined by custom or often by chance. The population is steadily and rapidly decreasing, and the inroads of disease and ill effects of liquor are, as usual, doing the work of extirpation of this race.

As to their organisation, it must be distinctly understood that these Indians owe no manner of allegiance to any head cacique, such as Calficura, or any other, though they may agree to obey one chief, as, for instance, Casimiro; nor are they, except by intermarriage or voluntary association, politically united with either Pampas or Araucanians. Their natural bias is to independence, and rather insubordinate ideas of ‘one man being as good as another.’ Cuastro’s dying words, ‘I die as I have lived—no cacique orders me,’ aptly express the prevalent feeling on this subject. Nevertheless, all ‘parties,’ however small, are, when travelling, under the command of a cacique or ‘gownok,’ who is sometimes also designated by the more endearing epithet of ‘yank,’ or father; but his influence is very frequently confined to ordering the march and chase. Some of the chiefs are hereditary, but it is not invariably the rule; and amongst the northern Indians there are many petty chiefs, who are men that, having become possessed of a few mares and horses, assume the title of cacique. Great etiquette is observed between them; one chief being prohibited by custom from entering the toldo of another unless presents have previously been interchanged. Another curious point of etiquette is, that a man is not allowed to look towards his father-in-law when in conversation with him; this is, however, not confined to the aristocracy, but also applies to the- 185 – common herd. When two parties of Indians are approaching one another, and sufficiently near to distinguish the smoke of the hunting-fires, a signal-fire is lighted, and a chasqui—called by the Tehuelches coêto—generally some relative of the chiefs, is despatched from either side. On meeting they repair to the camp of the most powerful, and, on arriving near, more horsemen sally out and escort them to the toldo of the chief. On arrival the new comer dismounts, his horses and gear are taken charge of, and he is shown, with great formality, to a seat, where he patiently remains, sometimes for an hour, answering, with grave face, all questions; and then delivers any message he may be entrusted with. Although he may be wearied, tired, and hungry, he never moves until the formalities are concluded; he is then provided with the best food and accommodation his host is possessed of.

It is to be hoped that the narrated actual life in the toldos will have enabled the reader to form an idea of the character of the Tehuelches more favourable than that which—except by the missionaries, Messrs. Hunziker and Schmid—has usually been assigned to them. They certainly do not deserve the epithets of ferocious savages, brigands of the desert, &c. They are kindly, good tempered, impulsive children of nature, taking great likes or dislikes, becoming firm friends or equally confirmed enemies. They are very naturally suspicious of strangers, but especially those of Spanish origin, or, as they term them, Cristianos. Nor, considering the treatment, treacherous cruelty and knavish robbery, experienced by them at the hands of the invaders and colonists alternately, is this to be wondered at.

In the southern part of the country, their frequent intercourse with sealers on the coast has rendered them favourably disposed towards Englishmen. This remark, of course, does not extend to the northern Tehuelches, who have not the same opportunities.

In my dealings with them I was always treated with fairness and consideration, and my few belongings—although borrowed at times, according to their mutual way of acting- 186 – towards one another—were taken the greatest care of; thus an Indian would frequently ask to look at my arms, and, after examining them, would carefully return them to me. During my whole stay amongst them I only lost two articles: the first, a flint and steel, was, I have reason to believe, stolen by one of the Chilians; the second was a pair of ostrich balls, which were abstracted from the toldo. The Indians, although honest enough as regards each other, will, nevertheless, not scruple to steal from any one not belonging to their party. Thus, when they enter the colonies for trade, they will pick up a stray horse in the most natural manner; and in Santa Cruz, Graviel and others constantly pilfered iron nails and small articles. With regard to their truthfulness, my experience was as follows. In minor affairs they nearly always lie, and will invent stories for sheer amusement; thus, Mrs. Orkeke came to me whilst in Teckel with the news that Casimiro’s wife was dead. My remark was, ‘And a good riddance too!’ which was received with a burst of laughter, and the information that she was as alive as ever, only her eyes were bad. I could cite many other similar instances of romancing on the part of the Indians. Old Orkeke I never caught out in a direct lie, and he always, when informing me about any subject, added, ‘I do not lie.’ In anything of importance, however, such as guaranteeing the safety of a person, they were very truthful, as long as faith was kept with them. After a time, when they ascertained that I invariably avoided deviating in any way from the truth, they left off lying to me even in minor matters. This will serve to show that they are not of the treacherous nature assigned to them by some ignorant writers. Nor are they habitually cruel, even to slaves or captives. The Chilian deserters were always well housed and fed, and lent horses to ride; and nothing but their incurably bad dispositions and constant plots brought on them a fate which, in truth, could hardly be thought ill-deserved, whereas the few good ones of the party rose into high favour.

For my own part, I felt far safer amongst the Tehuelches, as long as they had no drink or no fights, than I subsequently- 187 – did in the Rio Negro. Of course when they are drunk their passions become unbridled; they remember old feuds, and at times will fight for mere fighting’s sake. It is not necessary, however, to go so far as Patagonia to observe this. The finest trait, perhaps, in their character is their love for their wives and children; matrimonial disputes are rare, and wife-beating unknown; and the intense grief with which the loss of a wife is mourned is certainly not ‘civilised,’ for the widower will destroy all his stock and burn all his possessions: thus Paliki, before the death of his wife, was a wealthy Indian; but when I knew him he was poor and reckless, having destroyed all his property, and taken to gambling and drinking in despair at his loss. Casimiro even declared that his son Sam—whom I certainly should not have suspected of disinterested affection for any human being—had ruined himself, and become careless of his life, after his wife’s death.

The children are indulged in every way, ride the best horses, and are not corrected for any misbehaviour. I was always astonished that the youths and young men did not grow up more headstrong and wilful, as a result of want of training. People who have no children of their own sometimes adopt a little dog, on which they lavish their affections, and bestow horses and other valuables, which are destroyed in case of the owner’s death.

It has always been a matter of surprise to me that the missionaries should have been so unsuccessful in their efforts to teach these children of nature to read and write, for they are naturally very intelligent (though of course there are exceptions). As a proof of their quickness in imitations, with very little trouble I taught Hinchel’s son to write his father’s name and those of two other Indians in a very short time. I also used to draw ships on a board with a piece of charcoal for the children’s amusement, and they readily copied them. Hinchel himself, wishing to explain a part of the course of the Rio Negro, drew out a rough chart on the board, showing the bends of the river, which I afterwards found to be perfectly correct.

– 188 –

Whilst in their native wilds, I observed little immorality amongst the Indians; in the settlements, however, when debased by intoxication, they are, no doubt, depraved and loose in their ideas. But it must be recorded that, on the entry of the Indians into the settlements of the Rio Negro, at a subsequent period, most of the young women and girls were left with the toldos in Valchita, outside the Travesia, to be out of the way of temptations. There are many Tehuelche youths now growing up who have the greatest abhorrence of liquor; and I hope that in time this abstinence will spread further among them, for they possess no intoxicants of their own, and the rum is an import from the Christians, the ill effects of which they are well able to discern.

One word of advice to the future traveller may conclude this imperfect sketch. Never show distrust of the Indians; be as free with your goods and chattels as they are to each other. Don’t ever want anything done for you; always catch and saddle your own horse. Don’t give yourself airs of superiority, as they do not understand it—unless you can prove yourself better in some distinct way. Always be first, as you are not likely to be encumbered by a wife or gear, in crossing rivers, or any other difficulties; they will learn by degrees to respect you; in a word, as you treat them so they will treat you.

The Southern Counterpart

I often considered Brazil to be more or less the Southern counterpart to America in the sense of being both geographically and economically largest powers in their respective continents. Though this isn’t always the case, both of them have a substantial African slave descended population (as far as I know about it) and have close equivalents to their own hillbillies.

(In fact, caipira is practically the Portuguese word for redneck/hillbilly/rustic.)

Brazilian hillbillies live in the Deep North, American hillbillies live in the Deep South. That does make you wonder if Brazil is the Southern counterpart to America, might Chile and Argentina be the equivalent to Canada? Barring America’s Alaska, Canada’s more or less similar to Chile and Argentina in the sense of being this close to polar regions.

(Argentina might be a better one as it’s got the world’s coldest city and has an outpost in the Antarctic, parts of Canada are within the Arctic circle.)

Some of it’s not that close but close enough to warrant comparisons.

Handbook of South American Indians: Physical anthropology, linguistics and … (Google Books)

Family Canidae, dogs, foxes; entire Neotropica except Antillea;
secondary endemics: All the native Neotropical canids are foxes,
with the exception of the bush dog. The tawny wild dog, “perro
cimarrón” of Argentina, has been shown by A. Cabrera (1934) to
have been a feral pariah dog of European stock brought in by the
Spaniards. A true wolf (Canis mehringi) existed in Argentina in late
Pleistocene (and early Recent 2) times, but it is not known to have
been contemporaneous with early man. Nor is it known that the
blood of any Neotropical fox has entered into any breed of aboriginal
dog despite assertions by Latcham (1922). Rarely do foxes and true
dogs cross, and then the offspring may be infertile. However, Krieg
(1925) reported two litters from a cross between “Pseudalopez azarae”
(=Dusicyon gymnocercus) and a fox-terrier hybrid (terrier X fox 2).
(See p. 424 for discussion of dogs.)
The classification of the South American canids is as follows:

Osgood, 1934 CABRERA AND YEPEs, 1940
Family Canidae Family Canidae
Subfamily Caninae Subfamily Caninae
Dusicyon Dusicyon australis
(Dusicyon) australis Pseudalopez culpaeus
(Dusicyon) culpaeus gymnocercus
(Dusicyon) gymnocercus gracilis
(Dusicyon) griseus Lycalopez sechurne
(Dusicyon) sechurae Atelocynus microtis
(Dusicyon) microtis Lycalopez vetulus
(Lycaloper) vetulus Cerdocyon thous
(Cerdocyon) thous Urocyon guatemalae
Urocyon cinereoargenteus Chrysocyon brachyurus
Chrysocyon brachyurus Icticyon venaticus
Subfamily Cyoninae (Kraglievich,
1930 b)

Speothos venaticus

The forest fox, “raposa do matto,” “zorro” (Dusicyon thous, syn. D. cancrivorus) is found over the forested region of Guiana-Brazilia and extends to Tucumán in the south. This species was said by Latcham (1922, p. 17) to have been domesticated in northern South America, and to cross with the true (European) dog. He also suggested that it may have been the progenitor of the aboriginal hairless dog. His assertions as to its easy interbreeding with dogs and its being the ancestor of the hairless dog are probably incorrect, but that the species may have been tamed and even semidomesticated is indicated by Latcham’s quotation from Oviedo y Valdés. The description of the animal in this account corresponds well to D. thous, but Oviedo stated that he saw only one individual which had been brought to Hispaniola from Cartagena. The crab-eating propensity of the species, described by Oviedo and others, has not been verified subsequently as a characteristic trait, and probably the story resulted from a confusion of the fox with beach-scavenging feral dogs, or even with the large raccoon, “guachinin” (Procyon cancrivorus). Rare individuals of D. thous conceivably might have been the basis of some of the numerous descriptions of a mute dog, “perro mudo,” which was noted in northern South America in early colonial times. (See p. 425.) The “culpeo,” Andean fox (Dusicyon culpeus) is a large fox of the southern Andes and Patagonia. Latcham (1922, p. 19) erroneously considered it as having been the stem form of the aboriginal Patagonian and Fuegian dogs. The large maned fox, “lobo do matto,” “zorro de crin,” “aguaráguazú” (Chrysocyon brachyurus, syn. C. jubatus, pl. 42) is a huge fox (weight, 20 to 30 kg. or 44 to 66 lbs.) with large ears and extremely long legs (height at shoulder, to 90 cm., or 36 inches), and short body and tail. It lives in the bush and forest patches of the plains of southern Guiana-Brazilia (Bolivia and central Brazil to Paraguay and Uruguay), and is a striking animal in form and behavior. Latcham (1922, p. 14) stated that it might have been the progenitor of the “perro cimarrón,” quoting Torres, who identified dog remains from sites on the Río Paraná as of the latter type. The maned fox was suggested also by Latcham as possibly the greyhoundlike dog of the Guianas, but this seems highly improbable, and Latcham cited other authors who derived this greyhound from European stock (1922, p. 20). The bush dog, “cachorro do matto,” “perro de monte” (Icticyon venaticus, or Speothos venaticus) is an aberrant, short-legged, shorttailed fox-dog with reduced molar formula (M A instead of 3%). It is found in the forests of Guiana-Brazilia and in southern Central America (I. panamensis), but is considered to be rare. It tames easily, and may have been seen in a tamed or semidomesticated condition in northern South America by the early Spaniards and, with the tamed forest fox, may have been considered a “perro mudo,” though it can emit a short rasping bark (see Bates, M., 1944), as can the fox. (See p. 426.) Family Otariidae, eared seals (fur seals) and sea lions; mostly Patagonia-Chilea: The fur seal, “lobo marino de dos pelos” (Arcto. cephalus australis), is hunted for fur and meat with harpoons and nets, especially from Perú south to Patagonia. The young can be captured easily during the breeding season on outlying rocks, and they may have been an important seasonal item of food for the Indians (Townsend, 1910, p. 11). After the Spanish Conquest, hundreds of thousands were killed for fur, until now it is almost extinct. Arctocephalus is a circumantarctic genus, extending north only in the Western Hemisphere, to Guadalupe Island, Baja California. (The famed northern fur seal of the Bering Sea is a different genus, Callorhinus.) The sea lion, “lobo marino de un pelo” (Otaria flavescens), also of the southern coasts extending to Perú, is large, sexually dimorphic (males much larger than females), and was hunted by the Yahgan and Alacaluf in open water with harpoons and nets, and on breeding rookeries with clubs and spears, for hide and meat. The inflated hides were used as boats by the Chango of North Chile (Bird, Handbook, vol. 2, p. 597). It was important economically, was terrifically persecuted for hide and oil after 1700, and is now much reduced in numbers. Family Phocidae, sea elephant and seals; mostly Patagonia-Chilea: The sea elephant, “elephante marino” (Mirounga leonina), occurs along the southern coasts and adjacent Antarctic islands. It is a huge, clumsy animal, and probably is utilized for food and hide, though usually it is obtained accidentally. The leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx), Weddell seal (or shore seal, Leptonychotes weddellii), and crab seal (or shrimp seal, Lobodon carcinophagus) occur on the southern coasts, and they are bunted with harpoons and nets for hide and meat by the Chono, Alacaluf, and Yahgan. The monk seal (Monachus tropicalis) of Antillea, now nearly extinct, probably was utilized by the aborigines, but apparently no information on hunting techniques and uses have been recorded, although the Spaniards used the seal for leather and oil.

Scientific American, Volume 75 (Google Books)

Some Feral Types of Patagonia. av enonon 1:. wuss.

The types of dogs represented in the Arctic belt assimilate the colors, habits, and general characteristics of the wolf, fox, dhole, and other wild animals, so that it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the breeds from which they must have originally sprung ; and the truth was never more forcibly illustrated that all of our dogs have atendenoy to found new races of their own, and to return to the old primal stock, when freed from man’s control and left to their mutual selection. The white “ huskies ” of the British Northwest, the “reindeer dogs” of Greenland and Lapland, and the Athabaskan dogs of Mackenzie River district, are types resembling each other in many respects, but it is easier to trace their relationship to the lynx, fox, timber wolf, coyote, dhole, and similar wild animals, than it is to discover points of resemblance to the various domesticated breeds. White is the dominant color of the circumpolar world, and the dogs have been influenced in the color of their shaggy hair by the climate just as much as the bear, fox, ermine, reindeer, owl and ptarmigan; and their color resemblance to the wild animals must not be attributed entirely to their wild habits and associations with degenerate companions.

In the southern hemisphere, the semi-wild feral types partake of the same characteristics. The dogs of the Patagonian Indians, the semi-wild canines of the sheep raiser, and the hunting dogs of the few white settlers in that solitary region, are all of different origin, but through association and cross breeding they have come to resemble each other in many respects and to assume the colors and characteristics of the various wild animals. The chief fauna of Patagonia with which the dogs would associate are the wolf, fox, puma, and coyote, and it is not diflicult to see the influence of these animals upon their habits and looks. The sheep raisers of Patagonia have introduced the Scotch collie, but in their new home they have undergone changes that make them very different from the domesticated breed we are accustomed to. The white settlers who make a living in hunting brought the greyhound to their adopted land, and from this breed nearly all of the hunting dogs originally sprung. The Indians own flocks of dogs that are either mongrel greyhounds or a cross between the greyhound, Scotch collie, and the wild animals. They have degenerated to such an extent that the fine characteristics of the domesticated breed are nearly extinguished. ‘

The dogs of Patagonia are so numerous that they wander over the country in a semi-wild condition in great packs, but, like their cousins in the Arctic belt, they form avery important factor in the lives of the people. Without t-he dogs, half the industries of the country would prove profitless. As the inhabitants of the circumpolar regions depend upon their dogs to drag them across the snow and ice, to hunt for them in cold weather, and to perform various other services that no other animal could do so well, so the white settlers and the Indians of Patagonia place their main reliance upon their dogs in hunting the guanaco, the ostrich, and the skin animals and in watching their enormous flocks of sheep.

Patagonia is a limitless field for the sheep raiser, and over the vast stretches of country flocks of sheep numbering many thousands roam at will, feeding upon the rich vegetation which _nature provides with a lavish hand. The ranges are so wide that there is little danger of one man‘s flock encroaching upon the territory of his neighbor. But there is danger from wild animals and wilder dogs. The country is full of wild packs of dogs that have strayed from their masters and adopted the wild life of the wolf and fox. They are wilder and fiercer than most of the animals that we ordinarily place in the category of “ wild beasts.” The only wolf found in Patagonia is the aguarif, a small, shy, and almost harmless creature, but the wild dogs are really a species of wolf, fully as savage and bloodthirsty as the great northern timber wolf. They hunt in packs, and, when they have been separated from any human companionship for several generations, they are as bold as the fiercest wolf of the circumpolar region.

The sheep raisers ha.ve consequently had to raise a shepherd dog capable of competing with these wild dogs, and the Scotch collie has been bred for this purpose in a cross with the greyhound. The sheep dogs of Patagonia are perfectly adapted to the country. They retain all the valuable characteristics of their Scotch ancestors, with the added strength and fierceness of the Patagonian greyhound. Five or six of these shepherd dogs will watch a flock of a. thousand sheep, and do it so well that the shepherd has perfect confidence in the safety of his property. Many of the flocks number two.and three thousand sheep, and one man will have this number under his care. With a pack of adozen good dogs he can manage them with as much ease as another man could his thousand. His dogs understand their duties thoroughly, and the shepherd has trained them to work singly and together so well that there is never any confusion. In such a pack there is one dog that all the others recognize as their superior, and he is the leader of the pack, and so intelligent is

this creature that it seems as if he interpreted to the others the wishes of his master.

If a pack of wild dogs should suddenly start a commotion among the sheep on one side, the shepherd dogs are called together in a hurry. If the shepherd happens to be away, the alarm is given by the collie nearest to the scene. Instantly the leader of the pack takes up tbe’notes of alarm and calls his forces around him. Thus bunched together they pounce down upon the wild dogs or animals like a small hurricane. There are no wild dogs that can withstand the fury of these mongrel collies, for they have the blood of excellent ancestors in their veins, which _impels them onward in the fight to their very death. But it is rarely that one is killed, for they work together so well that the wild animals have no chance to resist them successfully. They are like the well trained and disciplined soldiers of a civilized nation fighting the wild savages of an unsettled country, and the results are about the same.

But protecting the sheep from the wild animals is not by any means the only or most important work required of the dogs. It is their duty to look after the sheep during the quiet hours of the day when no danger threatens. While the shepherd is attending to other duties, or quietly resting by his camp fire, the dogs must keep a good lookout for the sheep, and should any of the frolicsome ones become too far separated from the flock, the dumb shepherds must corral them in. Occasionally two large herds owned by different shepherds get together and become apparently hopelessly mixed. At such a time no human being could go among the sheep and separate them into their respective flocks. The shepherds, dangerous rivals probably in the business, and possessing antipathies for each other that sometimes lead them into deadly fights, confess their helplessness to each other, and trust everything to their intelligent collies. As if by instinct, the dogs know each member of their respective flocks, and they begin the work of separating them in a. way that calls for admiration. Out and in the mixed multitudes of bellowing sheep they run, singling individual sheep, and driving them into their proper ranks. The rival dogs never quarrel, but work rapidly until the flocks have been satisfactorily divided.

How they do this no one seems to understand. It appears almost incredible that they should know each sheep in a flock of one or two thousand, or that they can distinguish one from the other, and yet such is their intelligence one is forced to the conclusion that they are able to make some such distinction. Certain it is that they divide the flocks both to the satisfaction of their masters and their own canine leaders. Count the flocks beforehand and then again after the collies have finished their work, and the figures will be found to tally every time. To prove, furthermore, that the dogs get the right sheep in the separate flocks, experiments have been made by which the members of each herd were distinguished by small marks of paint daubed on the backs of the animals. This marking was done without the knowledge of the dogs, and the sheep were immediately mixed together so that the canines could not have time to familiarize themselves with the marks.

The hunting dogs of Patagonia are developed almost as marvelously as the shepherd dogs, and the work they are called upon to do is quite as diflicult. In hunting the ostrich, the Indians employ their dogs. They are fleet of foot, but not quite equal to the wild ostrich. When the ostrich is scared up, the pack of hunting dogs make a wild race across the plains after the gigantic bird. There is no fleeter runner than the ostrich, and the hunters are mounted on the best horses they can secure. The great ungainly looking creature stretches out its wings, lowers its head and neck, and scurries across the country like a scare crow, and, if it kept straight on in its course, it would leave dogs and horses in the rear. But the noise of the pursuing hounds startles and frightens it and it resorts to a trick that always gives it the advantage of the dogs, if not of the hunters. When the pack of bounds are the least expecting a change in the course of the race, the ostrich suddenly springs many feet to one side, and starts off at a very different angle. The bounds are unable to check their headlong career for some time, and when they have finally stopped enough to wheel about the game has placed a hundred yards between them. Most of the hunting dogs are so demoralized by this proceedingthat they slink away and refuse to renew the chase.

The hunters, however, have been waiting for this dodge, and just as soon as the big bird has swerved off to the right or left they raise their arms over their heads and swing their peculiar lasso through the air. This lasso is nothing more than a rope with a fork at the end on which two little stones are fastened. These stones are thrown with such dexterity through the air that they wind around the legs of the ostrich and entangle him so that he is thrown to the ground. The bird is never so puzzled as when brought to the earth in this way. It has not calculated upon the hunter’s stratagem, and it is completely nonplussed by the sudden appearance of the strings around its legs. Some old hunting dogs become so used to this sport that

they are not at all demoralized when the ostrich dodges them, for they know that their masters will accomplish in doing what they failed in. Like the pointer or setter, they realize that their work is limited to starting up the game and chasing it to the point where the hunter can capture it.

The hunting dogs are trained also to round up the guanacos. They work in large packs, and completely surround the prey before the alarm can be given, and then they close in upon them and kill them with their sharp teeth and powerful jaws. In this work they are invaluable, and they are worth a dozen cow boys. In hunting birds and wild animals the Patagonian dogs are famous for their persistence and intelligence, but when freed from their master’:-1 control they degenerate and become worse than the wildest animals of plain or woods.

The dogs have thus become in many parts of South America a veritable pest. Introduced to help – the hunters and sheep raisers, t’:ey have become a menace to the chief industries of the country. They wander over the plains in packs large enough to make it dangerous to unarmed travelers. There is a great attraction for the dogs to desert their masters and seek a. living by themselves on the plains. There are plenty of sheep and lambs and other animals that make juicy eating for them to capture, and their owners have to employ the strictest discipline to keep their canine friends from deserting them. Good dogs must be chained up except when on the hunt with their owners. To neglect this for a few weeks would ruin the finest hunting dog in the country.

The dogs became such a pest ten years ago that the large sheep ranchmen had to offer bounties for their scalps to protect their own interests. The wild dogs killed the sheep by the hundreds and thousands, and the nuisance increased rather than diminished. By offering bounties for their scalps the numbers were reduced somewhat, and the shepherds could feel comparatively safe once more.

There is likely to be another uprising of the wild canines in Patagonia which will greatly injure the wool industry of the country if something is not done to exterminate the roving packs of wild creatures. They are so productive in their wild condition that they multiply rapidly, and in ten years they easily quadruple their numbers. Roaming at will in a country that offers all the food they need, and with few dangers or extremes of climate, they naturally thrive, and the death rate among them is so limited that travelers rarely find the carcass of a dead dog on the plains, although the whitened and bleaching bones of innocent sheep are as plentiful as trees.

——+-0-.—-——— The Emission of Perfume by Plants.

A series of investigations made by M. Eugene Mesnard, in the laboratory of experimental biology of the High School of Science at Rouen, indicates that light, and not oxygen, is the chief cause of the transformation and destruction of perfumes, but that these two agents seem in many circumstances to unite their efforts. The action of light makes itself felt intwo different manners: on one hand, it acts as a chemical force capable of furnishing energy to all the transformations through which odorous products pass, from their elaboration to their total resinification ; on the other hand, it exerts a mechanical action that plays an important part in the general biology of the plants, and this property explains, in fact, the manner of emission of perfume by flowers. The author thinks that the intensity of the perfume of a flower depends on the equilibrium that is established at every hour in the day between the pressure of the water in the cells, which tends to expel outward the perfumes contained in the plant skin, and the action of light, which opposes this effort. He says the whole physiology of odoriferous plants depends on this principle. We may understand thus, according to M. Mesnard, why flowers are less odorous in the countries of the Orient than in our own regions : why trees, shrubs, fruits, and even pods are there sometimes full of odorous products more or less resinified ; why, finally, the general vegetation there is thorny and skeletonic ; for in these countries there is too much light and not enough water.—Revue Scientifique.

The natural history of dogs, including also the genera hyaena and …, Volume 2

The natural history of dogs, including also the genera hyaena and …, Volume 2

THE FERAL DOGS.

Canes feri.

Under the above designation, we mean to notice
domestic dogs which have regained their Uberty, and
subsisting entirely upon their OAvn inteUigence for
many generations, have resumed the greater part,
if not all the characteristics, which it may be sup-
posed they possessed before their former subjuga-
tion. Having already described species aborigine
wild, those fairly amenable to the present group are
reduced to but few varieties. The first we have to
mention is the

Feral Dog of Natolia. Ictinus of the ancients ?
This race is nearly equal to the local wolf in size,
and resembles the shepherds-dog of the country, but
has a tail more like a brush, the muzzle more
pointed, and the colours of the fur rufous-grey, not
unlike both the former, yet easily distinguishable.
Unlike the wolf, they hunt in open day, running
in packs of ten or twelve ; they do not molest man,
but, when attacked, they show an audacity which
wolves never manifest. In 1810, the son of a lady
of om- acquaintance, in company with a brother
Midshipman of H. 31. ship Spartan, went on shore
to the plain of Troy, attended by guides of the

THE FERAL DOGS. 119

country, and several seamen. A troop of these
dogs came down, and were recognised by the
country people, who Avarned the young officers not
to fire at them ; but midshipmen are not so easily
baulked, one fired and missed his object, when
the whole pack immediately came bounding down
towards them, and the party found it necessary to
run for the shore, whither the feral dogs, being
satisfied with their victory, pm-sued them no fur-
ther.

Feral Dog of Russia. — This race may be of the
same stock as the first mentioned. They are very
wolf-Hke in appearance and colours, but smaller,
and far less audacious than the Turkish. How they
maintain themselves in the open country we have
not leamt ; but, subsisting like the street-dogs of
Turkish cities, they make burrows in the ramparts,
on the glacis, and other banks of earth on the skirts
of towns, and even at St. Petersburgh, are prowl-
ing about in the night for carrion, and, in winter,
inclined to molest the defenceless. We were told
by a friend, long resident in the Imperial capital,
that one evening he, and another British merchant,
were obliged to go out to the rescue of a boy, sent
with a message across the ice of the Neva, who was
observed by the gentlemen to be beset by these
animals. More recently, the government ordered
the police to extirpate them about the city ; but
with what success is not known. It is possible that
the dog-wolves of the Canopian Gulph, on the
Palus Mseotis, which molested the fishermen, before

]20 THE FERAL DOGS.

noticed, were of the same race; and, therefore,
that they are really of a wild species, which has,
of its own accord, approximated mankind. Hence,
also, may be derived the true street-dogs of all the
cities of Western Asia.

Among the feral dogs of the New “World, men-
tion has already been made of the Aguara of the
Woods, But there is a race whose origin is not
doubtful, and which, although it is said to exist
also in South America, v/e denominate the

FERAL DOG OF ST. DOMINGO.

Canis Haitensis, H. Smith.

PLATE L

The specimen from which the figure and the fol-
lowing description were taken, was brought to
Spanish-Town, Jamaica, by a French officer taken
prisoner when General le Clerc’s army endeavoured
to escape from the victorious progress of the negroes.
The o^vner described it to be a wild hound, of the
race formerly used by the Spaniards for their con-
quests in the western hemisphere, when they Avere
trained like blood- hounds; and a breed of them
having been lost in the woods of Haiti, had there

I

FERAL DOG OF ST. DOMINGO. 121

resumed its original wild state, continuing for se-
veral ages to live independent, and occasionally
committing great depredations upon the stock of the
graziers. The individual Avas obtained from the
vicinity of San^ana Bay, among others purchased
from the Spanish colonists, for the odious purpose
of hunting the French negro people, which at that
time refused to return to slavery, after, by a na-
tional decree of France, their liberty had been by
law established. The dog was of such an aspect,
as at first sight to strike the attention. In stature,
he was at least equal to the largest Scottish or Rus-
sian greyhound, or about twenty-eight inches high
at the shoulder, with the head shaped like the wire-
haired terrier ; large light brown eyes ; small ears,
pointed, and only slightly bent down at the tips ;
the neck long and full ; the chest very deep ; the
croup slightly arched; the limbs muscular, but
light, and the tail not reaching to the tarsus, scan-
tily furnished with long dark hair ; the muzzle was
black, as well as the eyelids, lips, and the whole
hide ; but his colour was an uniform pale blue-ash,
the hair being short, scanty, coarse, and apparently
without a woolly fur beneath. On the lips, inside
of the ears, and above the eyes, there was some
whitish-grey ; and the back of the ears was dark
slate colour. The look and motions of this animal
at once told consciousness of superiority. As he
passed down the streets all the house curs slimk
away; when within our lodging, the family dog
had disappeared, although he had neither growled

122 FERAL DOG OF ST. DOMINGO.

or barked. His master said lie was inoffensive,
but requested he might not be touched. The hair,
from the ridge of the nose, feathered to the right
and left over the eyes, forming two ciliated arches,
and the brows appeared very prominent. We were
assured, that he followed a human track, or any
scent he was laid on, Avith silence and great rapi-
dity ; but, unlike the common blood-hound, when
he came upon his quarry, it was impossible to pre-
vent his attacking and seizing his victim. Accord-
ing to the OAvner, who, it seemed, was the person
the government had employed to purchase these
dogs, the Spanish graziers were equally anxious to
destroy all the old dogs of the breed they could find
in the country, and to secure all the young for do-
mestication ; beciuse, when bred up on the farms,
they were excellent guardians of the live stock, de-
fending them equally against their own breed, and
human thieves ; and, as they attacked with little
warning, strangers could not easily conciliate them
by any manoeuvres.

We think this to be the race of St. Domingo
greyhounds indistinctly mentioned by Buffon. We
saw another specimen, evidently of the same race,
but belonging to the northern states of South Ame-
rica, brought by a Spanish cattle-dealer to the port
of Kingston ; the animal was of inferior stature,
though still a large dog. The head appeared
broader at the muzzle, the back flatter, and the
hair was longer, coarser, more shaggy, and of a
dark blackish ash, without any spot. A third.

FERAL DOG OF ST. DOMINGO. 123

likewise blackish ash, came from Cuba ; but nei-
ther of the last had the greyhound lurcher aspect,
but seemed to have a cross of the Spanish common
cattle-dog.* Portraits of these kind of dogs occur
in some of the Spanish old masters ; and, consider-
ing the evident resemblance they bear to the old
northern Danish dog, it may be conjectured that
the race was originally brought to Spain by the
Suevi and Alans, and afterwards carried to the
New World for the purposes of war.

There is also in Mexico a small feral dog ; but
the accounts hitherto received are so obscure, that
we shall defer to notice it until we describe the
Alco. But, on the Pampas of South America, there
are numerous troops of Perros zimarrones, or feral
dogs, having the undetermined form of the mixture
of all the breeds that have been imported from
Europe, and thus assuming the shape of cur-dogs,
or of a primitive species. They have the ears erect,
or the tips but slightly bent forward. They are
bold, sagacious; not hostile to man, but destruc-
tive to the calves and foals of the wild herds. When
taken very young, they may be tamed ; but, when
old, they are totally irreclaimable. They hunt
singly, or in troops ; bun-ow in the open country ;
and, when redomesticated, they are distinguished
for their superior courage and acuter senses.

* These races of dogs were more anciently known in Europe
by the name of Buccaneer dogs (Chiens des Fhbustiers), be-
cause several were brought home by them. We have lately
seen one brought from the Falkland Islands.

124

THE FAMILIAR DOGS.

Canes familmres.

We now come to the true domesticated races ; and,
beginning with those placed nearest the Arctic Circle
in both hemispheres, we find a group of large dogs,
all assuming a wolfish aspect, having a tapering
nose, pointed ears, long hair, and, almost without
exception, a black and w^hite livery.

In the group of Arctic dogs of both continents,
there is an uniformity of structure and appearance,
showing but a small intermixture of the blood of
other races in some of those in the west, who have
the anterior part of the head very sharp. They are,
in general, dogs of large size and height, only par-
tially reclaimed, and, consequently, exceedingly
fierce. The body is short and deep; the limbs
strong and elevated; the feet rather broad, often
webbed, and, in some instances, furred; the hair
thick, close, and undulating. They swim -with
great facility ; burrow in the snow ; and, during
the period when they are turned out to seek their
own sustenance, hunt in packs, or singly, and fish
with considerable dexterity. Their courage and
perseverance is equal to that of a bull-dog, never

THE FAMILIAR DOGS. 125

giving up a contest while life lasts ; hence they
often destroy each other in combat. In their native
regions they are not liable to canine madness ; al-
though, in Sweden and Norway, wolves are occa-
sionally attacked with that di-eadful scourge in the
middle of winter.

THE WOLF-DOGS.

THE SIBERIAN DOG.

Cards Siherieus.

Koshaof the Natives.

This variety of the Arctic group differs in stature
very considerably. One exhibited some years ago,
by a M. Chabert, at Bath, was above three feet
in height. The ears resembled those of a bear ; the
head, that of a wolf; and the tail was like a fox’s
brush ; in fur and colour it looked like a greyish
wolf. There may have been a cross of the great
Russian watch-dog in this individual ; for the dogs
of Kamtschatka are smaller, though similarly formed.
Their colour is mixed black and white, the tips of
the ears slightly drooping ; and their attachment to
home, only a. kind of periodical instinct which
brings them to their masters’ doors, after they have
roamed wild for many Avecks to provide for them-

126 THE SIBERIAN DOG.

selves, and the time is come again when they are
to resume their labours at the sleigh. From this
period, they are only fed with a very small propor-
tion of the offals of putrid fish ; being treated with
absolute unkindness, they return the masters’ beha-
viour by a cunning and a rooted ill will. When
about to be yoked to a sleigh they send forth a
most dismal howling ; but when once yoked in file,
they become silent, and move off at a rapid pace,
not without occasional attempts to upset the
driver.

The two dogs figured by Buffon differ from the
Kamtschatka race, by having the hair much longer,
and particularly by that upon the forehead over-
hanging the eyes ; the tail being curled close over
the back ; and the colour on that part of the body
a dull ashy -brown. The second is figured much
lower on the legs, nearly entirely white ; and the
face still more marked with a profusion of hair.
These two were evidently inland varieties, probably
not further north or east than Tobolsk.

127

THE ESQUIMAUX DOG.

Cards Borealis.

PLATE II.

This is the race of the Arctic Circle in America,
most extensively spread, and clearly of the same
origin as that of North-eastern Asia. These dogs
are powerful in their structure, equalling the mastiff
in size, covered with long, rather curling hair, and
with a bushy tail, very much curled over the back ;
the ears are short and pointed, and the face clothed
with short haii’s, as well as the lower part of the
extremities. They are remarkably intelligent, pa-
tient, and endm-ing; dragging sleighs Avith great
rapidity, hunting with courage and skill, and carry-
ing burdens without repining. Their temper is
good, although in aspect they greatly resemble a
wolf. Several have been brought to England by
the members of the late Arctic expedition. Many
are black and white ; others of a dingy white ; and
those on the coast of Labrador are often broAvn ‘and
white.

The drawing for our plate of this dog was taken
from a specimen kept in the Prince’s Street Gardens,
in Edinburo’h. It had more the character of a wolf

128 THE ESQUIMAUX DOG.

than of a dog. The following account has been
kindly communicated to us by Mr. Cleghorn, nur-
seryman and seed-merchant, in whose possession
the dog was when the drawing was made : —

The Esquimaux dog Avas possessed of very great
sagacity in some respects, more than any dog I
have ever seen. I may mention one instance. In
coming along a country road, a hare started, and, in
place of running after the hare in the usual way,
the dog pushed himself through the hedge, crossed
the field, and, when past the hare, through the
hedge again, as if to meet her direct. It is needless
to remark, that the hare doubled through the
hedge ; but had it been in an open country, there
would have been a noble chase. One particular
characteristic of the dog was, that he forms a parti-
cular attachment to his master ; and however kind
others may be, they never can gain his affection,
even from coaxing with food, or otherwise ; and,
whenever set at liberty, rushes to the spot where
the individual of his attachment was. I may give
one or two instances, among many. One morning
he was let loose by some of the men on the ground,
he instantly bounded from them to my house, and
the kitchen-door being open, found his way tlirough
it, when, to the great amazement of all, he leaped
into the bed where I was sleeping, and fawned in
the most affectionate manner upon me. Another
instance was, when the dog was with me going up
the steep bank of the Prince’s Street Garden, I
slipped my foot and came down, Avhen he imme- •

THE ESQUIMAUX DOG. 129

diately seized me by the coat, as if to render assist-
ance in raising me. Notwithstanding this parti-
cular affection to some, he was in the habit of
biting others, without giving the least warning or
indication of anger. He never barked, but at times
had a sort of whine. He was remarkably cunning,
and much resembled the fox; for he was in the
practice of strewing his meat round him, to induce
fowls or rats to come within his reach, Avhile he lay
watching, as if asleep, when he instantly pounced
upon them, and always with success. He was swift,
and had a noble appearance when running, and
carried his fine bushy tail inclining downwards,
with the body nearly one-third more extended in
appearance than while standing, as shown in the
illustration.

I returned him to his owner some years ago, but
do not know whether he be still alive.

130

THE ICELAND DOG.

Canis Islandicus.

Fiaar-hund.

The Norwegian emigi’ants to Iceland seem to have
carried a race of dogs to its shores, which at pre-
sent is not found in the parent country. The head is
rounder, and the snout more pointed, than the pre-
ceding. In stature, it is not larger than that of
Kamtschatka, and in fur like the Esquimaux ; the
ears are upright, and the lips flaccid ; the colours
white and black, or white and brown. This race is
somewhat allied to the following, and therefore may
have been obtained from the Skrelings or Esqui-
maux, by the adventurers who first visited Green-
land.

131

THE HARE-INDIAN DOG,

Canis lagopus, Richardson.

This kind is clearly of American origin, and be-
longs exclusively to the race of man of the western
continent. At the first glance, we recognise in the
aspect an affinity with the Dusicyon group, before
described ; and, in particular, with those Canidce,
■which may hereafter form a more distinct section,
under the name of Cynalopecides. A specimen of
this race was found by Dr. Richardson on the Mac-
kenzie River ; and he describes it as small in size,
with a slender make ; having a large foot ; a nar-
row, elongated, and pointed muzzle ; ears broad at
the base, shaqj at the tip, and perfectly erect ; the
legs rather long and slender; and the tail, thick
and bushy, is slightly curved upwards ; the body is
covered with long straight hair, in colour white, with
clouds of blackish ash and brown intermixed ; the
ears outside brown, white within; the feet are
clothed with fur, and spreading the toes to some
breadth. These animals run upon the snow when
heavier game sink in. A pair is now in the Zoolo-
gical Gardens, where they are gentle and confident.
In their native land they never baik.

KING CHARLES’S SPANIEL,
PLATE VL

A BEAUTIFUL breed, in general black and Avhite.
and presumed to be the parent of

THE COCKER,
PLATE XV.

Who is usually black and shorter in the back than
the spaniel. This appears to be the Gredin of
Buffon.

The Blenheim, Marlborough, or Pyrame of Buf-
fon, is very similar to the above, but the black colour
is relieved by fire-colour spots above the eyes, and
the same on the breast and feet; the muzzle is
fuller, and the back rather short.

The Maltese Dog (Canis Melitfeus), the Bichon,
or Chien Bouffe of Buffon, is the most ancient of the
small spaniel races, being figured on Roman monu-
ments and noticed by Strabo ; the muzzle is rounder,
the hair very long, silky, and usually v^^hite, the
stature very small, and only fit for ladies’ lap-dogs.

201

THE WATER-DOG.

Canis aquaticus.

PLATE XX.

Barbet of the Continent.

/This race of dogs has the head rather large and
round, the cerebral space more developed than in
^j\y other canine, the frontal sinus expanded, the
ears long, the legs rather short, and the body com-
pact ; the hair over every part of the animal long,
curly, black, or white and black, sometimes rufous ;
leight at the shoulder from eighteen to twenty
inches. The water-dog, or poodle of the Germans,
is in its most perfect state not a British race, but
rose into favour first in Germany, and during the
revolutionary wars was carried by the troops into
France, and only in the latter campaigns became
familiar to the British iji Spain and the Netherlands. •
TTie coarser crisped-haired water-dog was indeed
long knovni to the middle classes of England, and to
fishermen on the north-eastern coast and profes-
sioaal water-fowl shooters ; he was occasionally
also brought to the environs of London, in order
to afibrd the brutal sport of hunting and worrying
to death domestic ducks placed in ponds for that

202 THE CUR DOGS.

purpose. No dog is more intelligent or attached to
his master ; none like the poodle can trace out and
find lost property with more certainty and perse-
verance. Several instances are on record of their
remaining on the field of battle by the dead bodies
of their masters, and Mr. Bell relates an anecdote of
one who perceived his owner had dropped a gold
coin, and watched it so carefully that he even
refused food until the money was recovered.

The Little Barhet is a diminutive breed, with
smooth and long silky hair on the head, ears, and
tail, while the rest is more curly ; and

The Griffon Dog is said to be a cross of the
water-dog and sheep-dog. It resembles the former,
but the ears are slightly raised ; the hair is long,
not curled, but gathers in pencils ; the colour ‘m
usually black, with tan spots on the eyes and feet ;
the lips are clad with long hair.

Tha Lion Dog is a small variety, with the head,
ears, and shoulders covered by long, curly, and soft
hair, and a floccose tail ; the rest of the body, lite
the lion, being proportionably clad in smooth fur.
This variety is extremely rare.

THE CUR DOGS.

Canes domesficii.

We have already shown, that in the western conti-
nent there were several races of indigenous small
dogs before the arrival of the Spaniards, but whether

THE CUR DOGS. 203

ihey came from the Thoan and Sacalian groups, or
sprung from a lost species now entirely absorbed in
domestication, is a question : we have in part pointed
out the presence of similar small species over the
whole surface of the old world, which in Greece, un-
der the name of Alopecides appear to have modified
and influenced the characters of the large breeds by
introducing their own individual capacities and
propensities. It is credible, in^fact, that in the first
attempts at the subjugation of canines to the pur-
poses of man, he would begin by the smaller and
less powerful individuals of the genus, and accord-
ingly we see most generally, where the savage stats
still obtains, that the dogs accompanying it are small
and resemble some wild species of the country, and
that universally through the world, when no care
happens to be taken in selecting the breeds and
preserving them more or less in the purity of given
qualities, the small cur blood predominates in their
character.

In Southern Africa we have a race of small Saca-
lian dogs ; in Arabia, one of Thoan form ; in India,
the parent Pariah breed, apparently captured in the
woods of the country ; Southern China, all Persia,
Natolia, and Russia have a similar predominant
race of curs, and in Europe there is every where
evidence of an originally indigenous species of small
dimensions, or at least of one, brought in by the
earliest colonists of the AYest, extending from Lap-
land to Spain; and if we search for that which
now seems to be the most typical ; that possessing

204 THE CUR DOGS.

innate courage, sagacity, and prolific power, without
training or care in breeding : we find these qualities
most unquestionably united in the terrier, and no-
where so fully marked with all the tokens of ancient
originality as in the rough-haired or Scottish species.
In the terrier we still see all the alacrity of innate con-
fidence, all resources of spirit, all the willingness to
remain familiar with subterraneous habitations, and
all the daring and combination which makes him
fearless in the presence of the most formidable ani-
mals ; for it is often noticed in India, that when the
bull-dog pauses, British terriers never hesitate to
surround and grapple with the hyasna, the wolf, or
even the panther. Nor is the arrangement of placing
the terrier race at the head of the cur dogs to be re-
jected, because we are habituated to consider that
appellation as applicable only to mongrels ; the name
Cur is only a mutation of the Celtic Gu^ the Greek
Kt;s(v, and even the Latin Canis^ all emphatically
pointing to the most ancient and general name of
the dog in Europe. Among them there are con-
stantly found individuals endowed with the keenest
faculties and discernment. One of the$e, as related
we believe by Michel Montaigne, who witnessed
the fact, was the guide of a blind man, who, when
his road lay along a brook, would draw his master
to the farther side from the water’s edge, although
it was there much more rugged and unfit to walk

205
THE TERRIER.

Cants ierrarius, Flem.

VIGNETTE, AND PLATES XVII., XVIII., XVIII.*

If there be an original and indigenous dog of Britain,
it is surely the species we have now under review ;
for if the Irish wolf-dog or a questionable gaze-hound
were derived from the British wolf, such a conquest
over a powerful and ferocious animal could scarcely
have been achieved without the aid and intelligence
of a previously domesticated and smaller species.
But it is more likely the terrier of antiquity was of
the same race with the hard-footed dogs of the

206 THE TERRIER.

Cymbers, and that the first were brought over from
the north-west of Europe with the primitive inha-
bitants. Certain it is, that the intermixture of
terrier blood with other and later races has in no
instance tended to diminish their courage, hardi-
liood, and fidelity, and in no part of Europe has the
rough-haired breed retained so completely as in
Britain all the traits which constitute a typical
species. No dog carries the head so high and
boldly, or expresses more lively energy than this
breed; the distinctions marking its purity of race
are equally discernible, although we have from
fancy or accident two very evident varieties. The
first is smooth, rounded, and rather elegant in make,
with colours usually black, and tan spots over the
eyes, a.nd the same tint spread over the extremities
and belly ; sometimes also white (PI. XVII) ; the
muzzle sharp, the eye bright and lively, the ears
pointed or slightly turned down, and the tail carried
high and somewhat bowed ; but the second, repre-
sented on the Vignette and on Plates XVII. and
XVIII., is the more ancient and genuine breed, usu-
ally called the wire-haired or Scottish terrier; the
muzzle is shorter and fuller, the limbs more stout, the
fur hard and shaggy, and the colour a pale sandy or
ochry, and sometimes white. Neither of these are
crooked-legged, nor long-backed, like turnspits, these
qualities being proofs of degeneracy or of crosses of
ill-assorted varieties of larger dogs, such as hound,
water-dog, or shepherd’s dog females, and then per-
petuated to serve as terriers. This is the case on

THE TERRIER. 207

the continent, where they use the turnspit mongrels
for the purposes to which our terriers, though
smaller in bulk, are far better adapted.

In Germany, the Saufinder, or Boarsearcher, is
a large rough terrier dog, employed to rouse the
fiercest beasts of the forest from their lair in the
thickest underwood, and they never fail to effect the
purpose by their active audacity and noisy clamour.
They are usually of a wolfish grey-brown, with
more or less white about the neck and breast, and a
well fringed tail curled over the back; having in
all probability in them a cross of the Pomeranian
dog, w^hich may have increased their stature and
their caution.

In England the cross of terriers is perceptible in
sheep and cattle dogs, but most of all in the breed
called bull-terriers, because it is formed of these two
varieties, and constitutes the most determined and
savage race known. It is reared in general for pur-
poses little honourable to human nature, and most
disgraceful to the lower orders of England, where,
for the sake of betting, the true wild game qualities
of the animals are exhibited in mutual combats, in
which neither will give up while life remains, and
the last struggle is borne without a groan ! Yet
they might be exported to, or bred with great ad-
vantage for the use of colonists in South Africa,
and contribute mainly to the security of persons
and property against the depredation of the lion and
the hyaena.

The Russian, Finland, and Siberian dogs of the

208 THE LAPLAND CUR.

cur races are so intermixed as to bear but little of
purity of their type about them. Yet there is a
breed in the first mentioned country, rugged and
low on the legs, with many good qualities ; but the
Siberian, usually black, are not larger than a hare,
with ears half erect, slightly folded in the middle,
the body round, and the tail obtuse at the end, where
it is white; this variety is exceedingly voracious,
familiar, and filthy.

The Lapland Cur is probably of the same race, —
black, or liver-coloured and rugged. It is a kind of
watch-dog, and used also in hunting ; but a people
depending entirely for subsistence on the produce of
reindeer, has not food to spare for large dogs, and
are unwilling to trust them in the vicinity of their
flocks.

Although the race of cur origin may be traced
eastwards through Turkey, Persia, and slightly in
Egypt, where the outcasts are an intermixture
of all the forms of dogs, we find in their squalid
exterior only a predominant tendency to the more
original race of each country, having universally
long tails, erect ears, lank bodies, and sharp muzzles,
with yellowish, yellow-grey, and yellow and white
colours; but it cannot be said with absolute pro-
priety that they are of the cur races of Europe, tlieir
aspect becoming more and more like that of tlie
Indian Pariahs, in proportion as we advance east-
ward ; and if we consider that Central Asia, India,
and Syria have for more than thirty centuries been
traversed by nations, by great armies, and still more

THE PARIAH DOG. 209

constantly by innumerable caravans, always attended
by canines both wild and domestic, it is to be ex-
pected that the whole area in question should be
tenanted by mongrels of interminable crossings, and
that at the extremities of the caravan movements
we should again begin to find decided marks of
purer breeds. This we have shown is the case in
some respects in Egypt, and we find it still more
clearly beyond the Indus, always excluding the
breeds watched by man. We find in those regions
The Pariah Dog, or native cur of India, a race
we have already shown exists to the north-east of
those regions in a vidld state, where we are assured
they occupy the woods in considerable troops, and
keep the jackal at a distance. The external appear-
ance of the animal has been noticed, and of the do-
mesticated we need only add, that they bear the
marks of degradation and mixture in various forms,
but still the rufous colours and their direct sign of
domesticity shown by the admixture of white pre-
dominates ; that they all have lengthened backs,
pointed ears, a sharp nose, and the tail more or less
fringed. They are sagacious, noisy, and cowardly ;
trained by the Sheckarees to their mode of sporting,
and used by the villagers in occasional hunts. Many
are in a state of wretchedness even greater than the
Turkish or Egyptian, but fondness for human so-
ciety is marked in all ; nay, they will sometimes fix
upon a stranger, and leave no art or exertion un-
tried to be admitted into his service. Thus, one
determined at first sight to follow a gentleman tra-

210 THE POE DOG.

veiling through the country in haste; he was as
usual carried in a palanquin, and the poor beast fol-
lowed by his side, stage after stage, until at length,
exhausted with exertion in a lonely part of the
route, he dropped, but kept looking wistfuUy after
the object of his choice till out of sight.

In the great Asiatic islands, the cur dogs still
retain the general characters of the Pariahs, although
about insular situations and great straits, where
navigation more necessarily congregates, a greater
variety of dogs must be looked for. This, for in-
stance, is already the case in the South Sea Islands,
vvhere the influx of European dogs brought from
different countries, and of different breeds, are
rapidly extinguishing the native race, known by
the name of

The Poe Dog (Canis Pacificus, Nob.), Uri-Mahoi
of Tahiti and Ilio of the Sandwich Islands, from
Uri a dog, and Mahoi indigenous. In form this
variety bears marks of decrepitude; the head is
sharpened at the muzzle, the ears erect, the back
long, the limbs crooked ; the hair is smooth, but re-
tains its primitive livery of tan or rusty ochre-colour.
It is a silent lazy animal, feeding on vegetable diet,
such as taro, bread-fruit, &c., and entirely reserved
for the table. Since the dogs of Europe have mul-
tiplied, the Poe dog is becoming daily more scarce,
and the practice of eating the flesh begins to be
abandoned, although it is considered a real delicacy
by the natives, and said by Europeans to be not un-
palateable ; but for this purpose vegetable food, with

NEW ZEALAND DOGS. 211

perhaps a little fish, must be given the dog, and as
the breeds from Europe are fed on animal substances,
they are never eaten.

To Mr. Frederick Bennet we are indebted for a
note on these dogs, which we here insert. ” Amongst
the Society Islands, the aboriginal dog, which was
formerly eaten as a delicacy by the natives, is now
extinct, or merged into mongrel breeds by proj^aga-
tion with many exotic varieties. At the Sandwich
group, where the inhabitants have been more re-
markable for the use of this animal as food, and
where that custom is yet pertinaciously retained
(owing probably to the scarcity of swine and spon-
taneous fruits of the earth), the pure breed of the
Poe dog has been better protected; and although
becoming yearly more scarce, examples of it are yet
to be met with in all the islands, but principally as
a delicacy for the use of the chiefs. As late as
October 1835, I noticed, in the populous and well
civilized town of Honoruru at Oahu, a skinned dog
suspended at the door of a house of entertainment
for natives, to denote what sumptuous fare might be
obtained within.” That gentleman then proceeds to
give a similar description of the appearance of the
dog as above indicated, making it equal in size to a
terrier, with a dull expression of countenance; tail
straight or slightly curled, a brown livery, and
having a feeble but shrill bark ; it is gentle, indo-
lent, and in aspect presents the mixed forms of a
fox-dog, turnspit, and terrier.

Those of New Zealand, according to Forster, are

212 DOG OF THE SOUTH SEA ISLANDS.

a long-haired breed, resembling the sheep-dog ; they
are of divers colours, variously spotted, entirely
black, or w^hoUy vv^hite. Their food is fish, and the
remains of what the natives eat themselves; the
mode of attaching them is by the middle of the
belly, not as we practise by the neck ; they are in
favour with that people, who nevertheless kill them
for food, for their skins, or to make fringes to their
dresses with the hair. These animals are stupid,
having little more sagacity than sheep. The same
author declares the dogs of the South Sea Islands to
liave very large heads and small eyes, with pointed
ears and short tufted tails.

What has been stated regarding the variety of
races of the canine family to be met with in great
islands and the shores of straits, we find confirmed
in the western hemisphere, about the Magellanic
Strait and the Fuegian Islands; for although the
native dogs of America north of the equator have
been already noticed, there remains still some ac-
count to be given of those to the south of it. On
the coasts, and wherever Europeans have pene-
trated, dogs introduced by them have multiplied,
and the wild aborigines have adopted them in pre-
ference to their own. Those of European origin,
carried to the west for the purposes of war, of
coursing, and of guarding cattle or plantations,
were, it may be assumed, numerically few in pro-
portion to the mongrels of all kinds which the
fancies of individual adventurers took in tlieir com-
pany; and all, it appears, on the continent, were

THE PATAGONIAN DOG. 213

with little or no care allowed to breed at random ;
hence in Paraguay, for instance, a true greyhound,
spaniel, or a bull-dog is very rare; the dogs in
general form a mixed breed, assuming, however,
characters distinct from the eur breeds of Europe,
and emphatically deserving the name of moHgrels ;
larger in proportion, more sagacious, more bold,
with acuter senses, with more personal enterprise,
but also with less attachment to mankind, and al-
most entirely destitute of education. Hence, in a
climate where they find food sufficiently abundant,
and they suffisr no rigour of cold, we cannot wonder
there should be feral dogs in numbers ; nevertheless,
the nations of the interior are still in part attended
by the same species as we have already described
under the name of Aguara dogs, and towards the
farthest south, where the resources of life are mucli
fewer. The resident Fuegian and Nomad Patago-
nians value dogs beyond measure, being only scan-
tily possessed of an indigenous breed, but from all
appearances having among them several mixed races,
acquired no doubt by means of the annual migra-
tions of the riding tribes towards the Pampas, and
by shipwrecks on the coast. Such at least, it would
appear, are the inferences to be drawn from the let-
ters on the subject Captain Fitzroy favoured us
with. We will here subjoin an abstract of their
contents, as much as possible in his ovm words.

” The dog of Patagonia is strong, about the size
of a large fox-hound ; his coat is usually short but
wiry, though in some instances it is soft and long
like that of a Newfoundland dog ; indeed I should

214 DOGS OF TIERRA DEL EUEGO.

say, in general terms, that the dogs seen by us in
the southern part of Patagonia resembled lurchers
or shepherds’ dogs, with a wild wolfish appearance,
not at all prepossessing ; one of this kind I obtained
near the Otway water; his habits were savage
rather than domestic. These dogs hunt by sight,
and do not then give tongue ; but they growl and
bark loudly when attacked or attacking. Their
colour is usually dark and nearly uniform, spotted
dogs being rare. The dogs of the Fuegian Indians,
Avho have no horses but move about in canoes, are
much smaller than those of Patagonia or the eastern
part of Tierra del Fuego ; they resemble terriers, or
rather a mixture of fox, shepherd’s dog, and terrier.
All that I examined had black roofs to their mouths,
but there was much variety in the colours and de-
g-rees of coarseness of their coats. Not one dog, out
of the number which were brought to England,
could easily be prevented from indulging in the
most indiscriminate attacks upon poultry, young
pigs, &c. Many Fuegian dogs are spotted, and not
a few have fine short hair, but all resemble a fox
about the head, although there are among them
many varieties of size and colour, as .well as of form
and hairy coat. One brought from Tierra del Fuego
was white, with one black spot, and very hand-
some ; his size was about that of a terrier, his coat
short but fine, and his ears extremely delicate and
long, although erect ; this is the case with all the
other breeds likewise, their muzzle also is long, and
they have the tail rough and drooping ; they keep
most vigilant watch, and bark furiously at a stran-

SOUTH AMERICAN DOGS. 215

ger ; with them the natives guard their habitations,
hunt otters, and catch sleeping or wounded birds.
As they are never or seldom fed, they provide for
themselves at low water, by cunningly detaching
limpets from the rocks, or breaking muscle-shells
and eating the fish.

” In the eastern portion of Tierra del Fuego, where
the natives have neither horses nor canoes, the dog
is invaluable; no temptation would induce some
Indians, seen near the Strait of Le Maire, to part
with a fine dog of the size of a large setter, which
had, except about the head, an appearance like that
of a lion ; behind the shoulders it was quite smooth
and short-haired, but from the shoulders forward it
had thick rough hair of a dark grey colour, lio-hter
beneath, and white on the belly and breast; the
ears were short but pointed, the tail smooth and
tapering, the fore quarters were very strong, but
the hinder appeared weaker. It had a wolfish
appearance about the head, and looked extremely

” None of the dogs in the southern part of South
America are mute ; there are none in a wild state,
and there is a scarcity rather than an abundance of
those which live with the aboriginal natives. In
times of famine, so valuable are dogs to them, it is
well ascertained that the oldest women of the tribe
are sacrificed to the cannibal appetites of their coun-
trymen rather than destroy a single dog. ‘ Dogs,’
say they, ‘ catch otters ; old women are good for
nothing.’ “